-
Essay / Why Eating Meat for Human Pleasure is Immoral
I am writing to express my thoughts on animal welfare regarding the consumption of meat for humans. In this letter, I will discuss my position and present my arguments that will try to convince you that eating meat is not moral for animals. The letter will be structured and told from a philosophical point of view, so some philosophical terminology is used, and I will define them first. Normative ethical frameworks are the three perspectives that judge morality. First, ethics is concerned with the duty of action. He judges morality based on what is done. Next, utilitarianism focuses on the overall happiness of the situation. Finally, virtue ethics examines the character of a person's decision to determine goodness. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get the original essay First, killing an animal for human consumption and enjoyment is not moral from an animal rights perspective. This is based on ethics, because using something as a means to an end means that the "something" is used to achieve a result desired by the party using it, but the "something" does not don't take advantage. This is considered immoral, because one party benefits, while the other does not, making the situation unfair. To illustrate this, we can use premises and conclusions to demonstrate a logical thought process. Premise 1: All creatures who can suffer should have the right to live. Premise 2: Animals can suffer and feel pain. Conclusion: animals have the right to live. The reason animals have this “right” to live is because they can feel pain and loss. Jeremy Bentham is the founder of the reform utilitarian school of moral philosophy and said that "the question is not 'can they reason?' nor “Can they speak?” but 'can they suffer?' » He argues that the capacity to suffer entitles him to consideration equal to that of others who can. All animals can suffer to the same degree as humans. Secondly, ending the life of an animal means depriving it of its interests. Animals, like all living things, have interests. “Interests” refers to the aspects of life they wish to experience and experience. Aussie Abattoirs, part of the Aussie Farms Repository, is an organization fighting animal slaughter. They report figures that show how much an animal's lifespan is shortened when it is raised for meat. In the most extreme case, male chicks are killed within a day of birth in the egg industry, which is 2,920 times shorter than their natural lifespan of 8 years. Other animals have on average a life expectancy 60 times shorter than their wild life expectancy. Ending life prematurely is immoral, but the way it is done is worse. In addition, animals are not taken into account in their well-being. Animals are subjected to inhumane conditions when raised in factories. A documentary titled “From Farm to Fridge” showed behind the scenes of factory farming and the appalling conditions the animals were subjected to. The animals were tortured, forcefully controlled and brutally handled. It is unethical to treat animals this way, and given that slaughtering animals for their meat is immoral, there is no need to cause them this harm, on top of already unintentionally giving them the life. From an ethical point of view,,?”.