Table of ContentsIntroductionTargetTypes of Terrorist ActivitiesRevolutionarySub-RevolutionaryEstablishmentHistoryImplications of TerrorismConclusionIntroductionIt is the use of violence to create fear in a population using a systematic method in order to obtain financial, political, religious gains. , or any other ideological cause. Although no definitive definition is available, the definitions treat all acts of terrorism, regardless of their motivations, as simple criminal activity. Terrorism on different bases has different and very distinct modes of manifestation, but they all share several elements. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why violent video games should not be banned”?Get an original essayThe main implication of terrorism is the creation and spread of fear, not only among the direct victims but also among a wide public.TargetTerrorists seek to attract and maintain publicity in order to generate widespread fear. They must increase violent and high-profile attacks such as kidnappings, car bombings, suicide bombings, hostage takings and plane hijackings. Even though the victims are random, the locations are carefully chosen for their shock value. Places like schools. Shopping malls, train stations, nightclubs and churches have always been targets because they attract large crowds and because the civilian population feels safe and comfortable. The main goal of terrorism is to destroy the public's sense of security in the places they are most familiar with. Primary targets include buildings or locations that are important political symbols, such as military installations or embassies. With these acts, provocation will incite the population to pressure political leaders in a certain political direction. Types of Terrorist Activities There are many different types of terrorist activities. Therefore, the fact that there are many terrorist movements makes it impossible for a single theory to cover them all. Not only because the goals, membership, beliefs, and resources of the groups involved are extremely diverse, but also because of the political contexts of their campaigns. There is a popular typology that identifies three types of terrorism: Revolutionary Sub-revolutionary Establishment terrorism. Revolutionary Revolutionary is considered the most common form of terrorism. Those who practice this form of terrorist activity oppose a political system that seeks to abolish it and replace it with new structures. Its modern examples are the campaigns of activity of the German Red Army faction, the Peruvian Shining Path, etc., each of which attempted to overthrow a national regime in the respective countries. Sub-revolutionarySub-revolutionary is a less common form of terrorism. It is used to modify the existing socio-political structure but not to overthrow the existing regime. Members of sub-revolutionary groups are difficult to identify because this is achieved by resorting to the threat of overthrowing the government or regime in place. A quick example is that of the South African ANC whose complaint sought to end apartheid in the country. State or state-sponsored terrorism is used by governments or more often by factions within the government against citizens, factions within the government, or against foreign governments or groups. This type or form of terrorism is difficult to identify,but it is nevertheless the most common of all. This would mainly be explained by the fact that state support is always hidden. The most persistent element of establishment terrorism, unlike other forms of terrorism, is that of secrecy. States seek to disavow their active involvement in such acts, in order to escape international criticism and avoid any political or military revenge on the part of their target. HistoryTerror is practiced by non-state and state-sponsored organizations. State for many years around the world. The first examples of terrorism cited today are the activity of the Jewish Sicarii who frequently and violently attacked fellow Hebrews suspected of conspiring with Roman authority. Similarly, during the French Revolution, Robspierre openly advocated terror, while the Spanish Inquisition arbitrarily arrested, tortured, and executed to punish what was considered religious dissent. With the end of the American Civil War in 1865, rebellious Southerners formed the Ku Klux Klan to intimidate those who supported Reconstruction (1865-1877) and those who had previously been slaves. In the mid-19th century, terror was also adopted in Russia, Western Europe, and the United States by supporters of revolution who believed that assassinating people in positions of power was the best way to exert influence revolutionary socio-politics. This led to the subpoenas of kings, prime ministers, government officials, and even presidents, from 1865 to 1905, by anarchists. In the 20th and 21st centuries, we have witnessed intense changes in the use and practice of terror to drive political agendas. The 20th century itself became the hallmark of many different political movements stretching extremely far from the left to the right of the political field. Vast technological advances have given terrorists new mobility and lethality. Innovations such as automatic weapons and electrical devices have brought this level of evolution. Terrorism seems to persist in political life. Prior to the major global attacks of recent years, there was widespread fear that the destructive power of terrorists could be greatly increased to even greater proportions through the use of weapons of mass destruction such as nuclear, biological or chemicals. An example is the 1995 Tokyo subway nerve gas by the Japanese sect AUM Shinrikyo. Since the 20th century, ideologies and political interventions have led many countries to engage in international terrorism, often under the guise of supporting national liberation movements. Thus, it has become common to say that "one man's terrorism is another man's liberation struggle." The distinction between terrorism and other forms of political violence is blurred – especially since many terrorist groups often resort to terrorist tactics – and administrative and legal issues are also obscured. These problems have led social scientists to propose a definition of terrorism that is based not on criminality but on the fact that victims of terrorist violence are often innocent citizens. Although this definition is flexible, it is sometimes expanded to include a variety of other factors, such as whether the terrorist acts are committed covertly or subtly and whether the terrorist acts are intended to create great fear. Towards the end of the 20th century, the term "ecoterrorism" was used to describe acts of environmental destruction carried out for political or military purposes, such as.