This topic of sex work fits into broader gender and public policy perspectives, as it aims to address the impact of Canadian laws on prostitution on people involved in the sex industry. The case of Bedford v. Canada from the Supreme Court of Canada is a decision relating to sex work in Canada. The applicants, Terri-Jean Bedford, Amy Lebovitch and Valerie Scott, argued that Canada's prostitution laws deprived sex workers of their right to safety by giving them no choice but to work in secret. The three main prohibitions in the Bedford case related to the operation of bawdy houses, which forced sex workers to negotiate prices in private spaces, which are typically dangerous spaces where prostitutes can be victimized. Say no to plagiarism. Get a Custom Essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”?Get the original essayLiving off the avails of prostitution is also illegal, making it illegal for prostitutes to create a safe workplace, such as hiring guards body or take safety measures. The third major prohibition concerns communicating in public for the purposes of prostitution. This creates an obstacle to starting a family and having children. These laws ultimately force sex workers into dangerous situations and could have led to further victimization, as crimes against prostitutes would go unreported for fear of double criminalization. Former Justice Minister Peter McKay introduced Bill C-36 on December 6, 2014. Prior to this date, the sex industry was regulated by the Criminal Code of Canada. The motivations for this bill are to protect sex workers and people who purchase sex by criminalizing the purchase of sexual services, deriving material benefit from sex work, advertising sexual services, and communicating on the purpose of sex work. This goal makes prostitution illegal. Sex work, particularly prostitution policy, is becoming a critical issue in Canada as it explores organized crime, health security, human trafficking, abuse and human rights violations. This issue must be addressed by policymakers and representatives at the national and international levels to create equal laws to ensure the safety of sex workers. Despite concerns about the health and safety of sex workers, women in Canada do not have appropriate legal measures to work due to the criminalization of sex work by Bill C-36, creating disadvantages and marginalizing sex workers with a punitive attitude towards prostitutes, prostitution jurisprudence. constructs victims of abuse and unsafe conditions, and the stigma surrounding sex work diminishes the legitimacy of the career. Canada v. Bedford is a Supreme Court of Canada decision regarding Canadian laws regarding sex work. Former Justice Minister Peter McKay introduced Bill C-36 in 2014, which criminalized certain aspects of sex work, such as purchasing bodyguards, working in public spaces and communicating in public for the purposes of prostitution. Without the decriminalization of prostitution, there will be no government funding to ensure financial support for these women, there will be no regulation of brothels and mental health support. The jurisprudence on prostitution creates.