Table of ContentsThe Golden RuleHill's Christian Business EthicsNash's Contractual Business EthicsImmanuel Kant's Categorical ImperativeJohn Stuart Mill's Utilitarianism and Negative UtilitarianismVirtue Ethics (Aristotle)Damon's Four Dimensions of Business MoralityReferencesEthical activity refers to the activity that gives the greatest to the most remarkable number. This implies that a specific activity must be able to bring its best to countless numbers of people rather than just a few members of the general public for it to be considered ethical. The essay analyzes seven ethical methodologies and provides a critique of the approaches: Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an Original Essay The Golden Rule (One should treat others as he or wish to be treated), Christian Hills Ethics for Business (God's Keys are also Keys to Business Ethics) , Nash's contractual business ethics (focuses on both delivering value and delivering services to the organization's customers and employees and not on maximizing returns), Emmanuel's categorical imperative Kant (aims to evaluate moral actions and moral judgments), John Stuart Mill's utilitarian and negative utilitarian (the theory allows one to differentiate the degree of good and evil), Aristotle's virtue ethics (puts the emphasis on virtues or moral character), Damon's Four Dimensions of Business Morality (provides the remedy in all aspects to business problems). The four dimensions constitute a link between the moral instrument and all aspects of the functioning of the company. The approach I like the most is the Golden Rule, because I believe that a person is able to evaluate what is wrong and what is right when he stands in the other's shoes. person and think like the other person. Additionally, everyone wants to be treated well, so if a person thinks about how they would like to be treated and treats others the same, that would be the best way to maintain harmony within the organization. In my opinion, the theory is useful in that it maintains balance and respect for humans towards each other by treating others as one should also be treated. The Golden Rule The Golden Rule is an ethical rule that recommends that one treats others as he or wishes to be treated. It works according to the law of correspondence which expresses that “do unto others as you would have them do unto you”, making it the most advocated guideline on earth. The rule has types and parents who identify with it, for example, the silver rule, the platinum rule, the love rule, role taking, among others. The rule requires an individual to be a specialist and choose the most effective method to treat others. The quality of the theory incorporates a call for self-reflection and a healthy appearance in believing how one should be treated in an alternative circumstance. The theory may have worked in past social orders, but in different current social orders, individuals have distinct inclinations to treatment and do not like to make it full of imperfections. The theory is also individualistic in that it operates only between an individual and another individual or group. The rule is not down-to-earth in a circumstance where there are conflicting needs and interests. In my opinion, the theory is useful in that it maintains balance and respect for humans towards each other by treating others as one should be treated. also treated.EthicsHill's Christian approach to business applies Christian ethics in the decision-making process. Hill explores various virtues of Christianity such as holiness, justice as well as worship. He argues that these keys to God are also keys to business ethics. He uses a three-legged stool to clarify the three virtues, as an absence of values ​​will result in an unbalanced stool. Notwithstanding these three values, it also considers the consequences of whether justice has been served. The methodology has certain strengths that are useful in complex business dilemmas because of its lucidity without being simplistic. The three-legged stool is more snug than a single golden rule and less cumbersome than other ethical approaches. The weakness of the methodology is that it involves determining what is sacred, valuable, and right to the influenced parties. It is also a question of testing what incentive should be given in the event of a conflict of justice and love. The methodology is useful in many contexts because it promotes those virtues essential to human life and relationships between diverse individuals or groups. Ethical approaches encourage employees to stay with the company and reduce employee turnover. All things being equal, Damon's four dimensions of business morality apply to all business operations; now the ideal way to deal with all dilemmas because of its four dimensions which cover all areas. Nash's Contractual Business Ethics The methodology was put forward by Laura Nash in which she explains how business modes focused on self-interest specifically for commercial behaviors have not been widely favored. taken to integrate ethical principles into decisions made by the board of directors. The methodology focuses on both delivering value and delivering services to the association's clients and employees and not on increasing returns. It also focuses on how the administration should treat its employees: trust and respect them. It increases collaboration between individuals and can stimulate business development by creating values ​​and strengthening trust and respect between employees and managers of organizations. The methodology is used adequately to create trust and respect within organizations. Ethical managers approach their employees with respect and customers have also been energized in the pursuit of estimating their cash flow. I would use this method to improve the control of the transmission of services within my association because of its common sense and furthermore to ensure the success of my business. I conceptualize that this methodology will be significant in the consumer-focused office. Immanuel Kant's Categorical Imperative Methodology is the central idea according to deontological philosophy. It refers to the method of inspiration for a specific activity and is an improvement on the Golden Rule. It aims to evaluate good actions and good judgments. He uses three formulations to sort out the good principles of judicious beings in which he speaks of humanity as well as sensible needs, including the "needs of the domain." Kantian methodology has a greater number of weaknesses than strengths. Although it is able to assess oral judgment and morality and presents an obvious way of approaching ethics, which is for many desirable, the theory does not consider the consequences of an activity as the does the utility. Nor does it consider that in certain contexts, two evilscan clash, thus depriving good agents of their self-government. The theory has not been used expressly in situations where two evils collide, thus posing an ethical problem. Because this methodology does not take into account the consequences of an activity, the universalized nature and the difficulties of good self-governance on the part of ethical agents, the methodology presents an increasingly significant weakness compared to the ethical methodology.Utilitarianism and negative utilitarianism by John Stuart MillUtilitarianism is a consequentialist moral theory. which defines morality based on the greatest utility expected of all parties to an activity or decision. The factory declares that actions or decisions are correct in the event that they advocate the useful significant for the lion's share. Opposed to Mill's predecessor Jeremy Bentham, Mill argues that selective pleasures are praiseworthy and therefore characterizes them (great) as general prosperity which can be reduced to Aristotle's eudaimonia. The strengths of the theory are that it is in accordance with our instinct that causing harm to individuals is not a good thing. It is easy to use because evaluating our negative and positive actions is simple, it is secular in the sense that it does not depend on beliefs about God and the theory is universal because it is based on the rule of utility: increasing happiness and reduce suffering. However the methodology has its weaknesses such as incommensurability because you can assign values ​​to pleasure, good or bad, it is a subjective theory because we as a whole have various perceptions of happiness. The methodology also does not take into account the feelings of the minority. The theory is viably used in decision making because the perspective of the larger party is considered to subsequently increase utility. Despite its effectiveness, the methodology sets aside the desire of the minority. This is essential for me in cases where there are wandering points of view and the requirement for a serious decision is obligatory. Virtue ethics (Aristotle) ​​The methodology emphasizes the virtues or good morality as opposed to the duties and rules of deontologists or the consequences of actions of consequentialists implying that it emphasizes individual character as an element key to individual deduction rather than rules or consequences. The aspect that distinguishes ideals ethics from other ethical approaches is the centrality of goodness within the methodology. According to the ethics of righteousness approach, there are two or three forms that integrate the ethics of eudaimonistic righteousness, the ethics of target-centered, specialist-based and exemplary ethics. The theory houses a series of strengths that incorporate the mapping of good reasoning. It does not depend on theories, but rather relies on personal advancement, improvement and inculcation of virtuous qualities. In any case, the methodology has weaknesses such as the inability to distinguish good and bad actions, does not unequivocally clarify where these virtues will motivate them, difficult to characterize the singular motivations for good advancement and does not offer no distinct answer to moral dilemmas. is viably used to allow managers and leaders to question the type of individuals they should be progressing toward and how their actions will influence others inside and outside their circle. The methodology does not matter for ethical problem situations which are therefore not suitable for dealing with such situations. Damon's Four Dimensions of Business Morality., 26, 57.