Thus, it appears that further reform is needed to implement an improved system to prevent teachers from crossing the threshold into negligence. Australia attempted to establish a no-fault system similar to the New Zealand model, but failed to adopt it on the grounds that it was not suitable for people with disabilities. Subsequently, the federal government investigated the National Disability Insurance Scheme and launched its program in 2013 to provide no-fault funding for assistance to people with disabilities. New Zealand has established accident compensation societies to pay for damages caused by physical injuries until the person dies in the circumstances of the accident. The no-fault regime should be available to teachers who the court finds responsible for student injuries but who acted reasonably within the scope of their employment. The no-fault system can prevent excessive personal injury claims. Therefore, the student who ends up injured as a result of the teacher's negligence can seek compensation through the no-fault system. Some viewers worry about the weakness of the no-fault system, in which it lacks deterrence and punishment. The no-fault system may not fit with the principle of corrective justice theory in that it is less likely to deter the teacher from preventing student injuries in the future since