Over the summer, my grandmother purchased a wireless security camera for her garden, controlled by an app on her smartphone. While helping her install this camera, I began to wonder if she was the only person viewing the video recordings or if the company that developed the camera and app had access to the footage recorded by the camera and if these images were to be distributed to outside groups of people or agencies. This curiosity about this topic led me to think about other closely related security issues. This has created a sense of concern that, while trying to prevent crime and terrorism, public surveillance could potentially excessively invade the privacy of millions of people. When I was given the task of thoroughly investigating a question of interest and writing an exploratory essay on that topic, I immediately knew that the question I would explore would be about surveillance, its advantages and its possible inherent dangers. By researching the question, “Has surveillance been taken too far or is it a necessary aspect of society that citizens must deal with in order to maintain a sense of safety and security?” ", I intend to better understand this compelling and, I believe, essential question. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get the original essay This issue has serious implications for people around the world and is a problem that, if left unchallenged, could get worse. The persistent problem of security surveillance affects almost every human being on the face of the earth. Security monitoring is now appearing almost everywhere. Whether it's through text messages, emails, web history, or even personal phone calls, there's always someone watching or listening and there's really no way to tell. 'avoid. In exploring the controversial topic of surveillance and its overall consequences on society, one potential perspective regarding this topic appears to be that while surveillance does infringe on people's privacy, it is an effective means of preventing certain crimes and activities. terrorists and to prevent certain citizens. Those affected by this invasion of privacy must accept the implications associated with surveillance and its essential goal of preventing the occurrence of events that could endanger the lives of American citizens. Government observation of the activities of millions of people is so discreet as to be almost undetectable. Even though this in-depth surveillance may seem very intrusive, it is very effective in preventing certain criminal and terrorist acts. The National Security Administration has tools that allow it to prevent almost any terrorist event, based on the millions of phone records that its computers sort and refine to stop plots to harm others. While these methods undoubtedly save lives, citizens must give up their right to privacy and any information they disclose that could be intercepted or sold to a government agency. Dan Parsons further warns that “as technology develops and the government's ability to collect and store metadata increases, communications privacy will likely continue to erode…”. Americans are their own worst enemy when it comes to staying private in this highly advanced world because technology provides the platform for people to create theirown personal monitoring log based on their use of technology and social media. The privacy of millions of people has undoubtedly been diminished due to constant technological advancements made more accessible every day. Airports are another area where privacy is sacrificed every day through the use of body scanners. One negative aspect of these detectors is that they display in-depth pictorial representations of what's under the clothes of every person passing through TSA security lines at airports across the country. The use of millimeter wave body scanners significantly invades the privacy of millions of people each year, but these scanners can detect anything that could pose a threat to airplane passengers. Although most people view the use of surveillance as an invasion of privacy, not everyone realizes that there is really nothing you can do to avoid being monitored by a higher authority. Contrary to popular belief, not everything that happens in a public place can be considered private because there are, by law, no real regulations regarding video surveillance. Due to the events of September 11, 2001, the PATRIOT Act was created by the United States government to prevent and thwart any plans to carry out terrorist activities. This law allowed government agencies such as the NSA and FBI to combat terrorism through the use of electronic surveillance. The NSA and other government agencies are legally allowed to encrypt millions of phone records and other data without a search warrant and without the person involved even knowing their information is being archived. When considering the morality and accuracy of government surveillance, many connections are made. are made to George Orwell's very famous novel, 1984, and its criticism of government espionage and its immorality, which proves to be very relevant to the way the United States government operates today. Along with surveillance through technology, American courts have justified that it is widely accepted that it does not matter whether a person is in a public space such as a sidewalk, their own lawn or even the public space of 'a public bathroom, it is expected that it may be video surveillance in progress. However, Jeremy Brown concludes that "...law enforcement and privacy advocates must work together to develop and pass regulations now." They need to act while the video surveillance infrastructure is still being built and can still be designed to incorporate privacy concerns. “Although the use of surveillance and its overall effects on society are often questioned, a large majority of people believe that surveillance is perfectly legal and is indeed an effective means of preventing crime and detecting terrorists. Basically, when a person enters a public space, that is, a place where it is implied that someone is watching, it is legal to have video surveillance. If people are in an area where someone could reasonably make observations about a person, then it can be inferred that there is no confidentiality in that information. There are many laws and legislation that validate the use of surveillance using many different techniques to prevent terrorism and crime. After 9/11, many laws such as the PATRIOT Act and the precedent.