South Sudan: no different from North SudanAll over the world, there are countries that suffer from conflicts that concern either the government or the people, good or bad . The situations in which these conflicts arise can either aim to help the country or destroy it. But in many cases, those who think they are doing good for the country often do bad. The scale of this problem is staggering in countries like South Sudan, where skirmishes continue between the government and the population. The newly liberated land is populated by people who told themselves they would not become what North Sudan was, but now replicate their northern counterpart to the shape of a T. To maintain peace and prosperity, South Sudan should adopt regulations on democratic voting in the country and more protections. for the people of the rebel groups while preparing to receive help from other nations to maintain this peace. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on 'Why violent video games should not be banned'? Get the original essay South Sudan's government has been in ruins since December 2013, just two years after the country gained independence from the party northern Sudan. This conflict arose after President Salva Kirr accused Riek Machar of stealing money from the newly created country. Machar was vice president then and is now the reigning leader of a powerful rebel group in South Sudan, determined to overthrow Kiir and seize power. Kirr also accused Machar of inflaming situations between the different tribes living in the country and thus increasing tensions with the government and rebels. Machar denied the allegations, speaking at a public rally: "At the time when I was vice president of the Republic of Sudan in Khartoum, he was the one who signed all the contracts with all the companies that then disappeared with South Sudan's money and failed to deliver on their promises. » (Clottey). President Kiir denies these statements by Machar, with his spokesperson demanding Machar's arrest and imprisonment for his alleged exploitation of South Sudan's money. South Sudan not only has to worry about its conflicts with Sudan, but also its conflicts between leaders within its government. Much of these disagreements have to do with their respective tribes as well as money thefts and coup allegations. This tense relationship between the two leaders provokes violence between Kiir's supporters and those of Machar, two very different and rival tribes. "It is estimated that around 10,000 people died in the fighting, which was mainly between President Kiir's Dinka ethnic group and Mr Machar's Nuer group." (BBC). This now tribal struggle for power in South Sudan has escalated beyond the need for both parties to control the government, and has plunged the entire country into a whirlwind of problems requiring outside help from others nations and the UN. Since the national spotlight was placed on South Sudan, many countries have started to intervene, pushing the two leaders to stop fighting and talk to each other. Kiir and Machar agreed to negotiate together in early February 2015 and end the fighting they provoked in South Sudan. Machar is demanding a place in the government again as vice president if Kiir wants the fighting to stop, and if those talks are successful he will become vice president again. The outcome of these negotiations will be announced in early March by the South Sudanese government, which will hopefully be good not only for the conflicting forces butalso for the population. The Kiir government's excessive brutality was not limited to Machar's rebel forces, but also to the South Sudanese as well. Countless numbers of people who dared to challenge or question Kiir have been beaten or killed, and an even greater number have disappeared. Non-violent protesters who oppose Kiir's presidency – even though they are not part of Machar's forces – have been shot dead by the army on Kiir's orders. “Last December, 11 people died after soldiers opened fire on people protesting the relocation of the local council headquarters to Wau, 643 km northwest of Juba. None of the perpetrators of these shootings have been arrested. » (Thomson). We know that the protesters were killed not because of a lack of training on the part of the South Sudanese army; but because they were ordered to kill them. It has become clear, both inside and outside South Sudan, that Kiir's claims of a new, democratic and just government have been put to shame by his shameful actions against his people. The severity of his rule extends not only to protesters, but also to lawyers who defend people in government and local writers who dare to write about their struggles. “After taking on the case of a woman whose family home had been confiscated without warning or compensation by soldiers, he was kidnapped and then beaten with electrified sticks.” (Thomson). This is the story of South Sudanese lawyer Ring Bulebuk Manyiel. After three days of torture at the hands of the soldiers involved in the case, Manyiel was barely alive when they finally decided they were done torturing him and dumped him in an abandoned cemetery. Although Manyiel reported the abduction and the individuals to the police, nothing was done to apprehend his attackers. This disregard for justice and fairness in South Sudan by those who are supposed to uphold them has many heads turning to the government and President Kiir to explain why, and no response has been forthcoming. given. The South Sudan government has also taken steps to close newspapers. who published anything against Kiir and the government. These actions did not go unnoticed by US Ambassador Charles Twinling: “I have been alarmed by recent reports of intimidation and harassment of journalists in South Sudan by elements within the government and I hope this is not a step forward” (Sudan Tribune). TWIN also called for the immediate reopening of the newspaper, viewing the entire situation as “intimidation and harassment of journalists” (Sudan Tribune). Twinning is one of a long list of ambassadors to South Sudan who have been troubled by the government's continued tendencies to break the law. Kiir has enacted many laws to maintain the democracy he promised the country, but "South Sudan ranks 124th out of 148 countries in the press freedom index" (Sudan Tribune). These statistics are particularly alarming for the countless world leaders who have invested time in helping South Sudan achieve prosperity and democracy, realizing that their attempts were in vain. Many of these leaders are considering withholding aid to South Sudan, due to Kiir's poor work. as president. The British ambassador to South Sudan, Alastair McPhail, has considered withdrawing aid to South Sudan. “It's always a calculation to make, but so many of our programs deal with health, education and food security and if we refused aid we would be punishing the wrong people” (Thomson). Population of Sudan.