-
Essay / Subjective review of the film "A Civil Action"
A Civil Action is a film that dates back to 1998 and is based on a true story starring John Travolta as a legal advisor and Jan Schlichtmann, it is about 'a film version of the pollution trial he fought for for the benefit of the citizens of Woburn, Massachusetts in the 1980s. The film depicts the illegal dumping of chemical solvents such as trichlorethylene and how it poisoned the city's drinking water, causing leukemia, cancer, and other medical problems among Woburn's general population. There were 12 deaths. Eight of them were children aged over 15 with leukemia. Anne Anderson, whose son died due to leukemia, planned to present a body of evidence against whoever is responsible for the deaths. In this case, the plaintiff is Anne Anderson and the defendants are J Riley Leather and WR Grace. After being rejected by numerous firms, he ended up in the hands of Jan Schlichtmann, a personal injury lawyer in Boston. Say no to plagiarism. Get a custom essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”?Get the original essay Initially, Jan dismissed the case because he didn't see a big payoff. He reevaluates after realizing that contaminated water in the creek could be tracked by two wealthy parent organizations, Beatrice Foods and WR Grace. The case ends up being unreasonably burdensome to prosecute and lands Jan's small law firm in deep obligations. Although the case ultimately settled for $8 million, Anne Anderson and town residents were unhappy with the settlement because they did not receive a statement of regret from those in the know. . Jan loses everything while trying the affair; his training, his companions, his house and his vehicle. After some time, Jan reveals additional evidence that traps JR Riley Leather and Beatrice Foods. He advances the new data as well as old case records to the Environment Protection Agency (EPA), mentioning that the EPA will retry all of the evidence against the two organizations. The case was later settled, with WR Grace and Beatrice Foods paying an unusually large sum of money to clean up the water and land of Woburn, Massachusetts. The film portrays business in a negative light. The entire film presents a body of evidence against two large organizations responsible for contaminating the city's drinking water. The film shows how organizations have no regard for nature or individuals. Woburn's two neighboring organizations, WR Grace and J Riley Leather, have long dumped hazardous solvents and have never taken care to store or contain the substance designated as a carcinogen by the EPA. This shows a lack of concern on the part of these organizations towards the land and the individuals in the neighborhood. Their recklessness is further exacerbated by the knowledge that the dumping of these synthetic concoctions was contaminating drinking water and causing intense medical problems, including various deaths among the city's citizens. Additionally, the organizations methodically attempted to conceal these illicit activities. The film further presents lawyers and the legal process in a negative light. The film's main character, Jan Schlichtmann, initially rejects the case and reconsiders his choice after realizing that there may be respondents with "deep pockets". Anne Anderson and her neighbors were not inspired by a money-related repayment, but rather needed a statement of regret from those who were paying attention. Regardless, many law firms rejected the case because they did not.