Both Sides of SustainabilityIn Dr. Seuss's "The Lorax", cutting down trees is inherently bad, however, in Terri Birkett's "Truax", cutting down trees is a necessity, this which teaches us one thing: it is impossible to completely stop deforestation. The problem for each side is that neither acknowledges or even mentions all the facts regarding the effects of deforestation on the environment. Instead, each story, in the form of children's entertainment, focuses on the flaws of the other, much like a critical political campaign, resulting in skewed but even higher favorability for itself. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an original essay. It would be fair, considering many companies' attempts to rebuild areas after gutting them, if its main character, The Truax, actually addressed all the valid points made in Seuss's film. Rather, it shows a lack of concern or thought about the relocation of animals caused by habitat loss. He doesn't know how to help preserve biodiversity in certain areas after doing his job and says frankly that it's not up to him to figure that out. Each story fails to understand its opponent's true point of view and, as a result, neither is an accurate representation of the truth about deforestation. The simple three-pillar sustainability process, balancing human need and ecological need, is a great way to analyze the ability of both governments and ordinary citizens to make much-needed changes. First, we must agree that all three pillars – society, economy and environment – ​​are important, even if not all to the same degree. If we view human satisfaction as the primary goal, a healthy planet, quality social interaction and finances are all important factors in achieving a better life. Second, we must accept that these three pillars do not always have to be in opposition to each other. . It is possible that a good economy creates a healthy environment and vice versa. The objectives can all be compatible with each other and, therefore, can be used to maximize mutual benefits. However, sometimes sacrifices must be made between the three. Companies may have to sacrifice what's affordable (like plastic water bottles) for something a little more expensive or slightly impractical like refillable cups or bottles. Finally, we need to start taking environmental devastation seriously. For example, replanting trees after removing them from an area is a good thing, but many problems remain because that ecosystem is completely changed. Trees take many years to grow back, and while this is happening, different species of animals must move to find other places to live. Keep in mind: this is just a sample. Get a personalized paper now from our expert writers. Get a Custom Paper EssayIn summary, it is necessary to recognize that a proper understanding of the deforestation situation must occur regardless of the pre-existing perceptions of those who are incentivized to sell you a certain point of view. Instead, we must pay attention to the factual reality of the situation and curate the best facsimile from an objective and independent point of view. Rather than arguing over each other, we must acknowledge the facts of environmental deterioration..