For all of us, global civil society is a new term. However, its importance is growing rapidly. As a result, there is much research on global civil society, as well as many scholars who believe that global civil society is the path to peace and stability. The common idea is that global civil society is closely linked to the liberal conception. This means that although there are different ideas about when this term was first introduced; The end of the Cold War was an important turning point in the history of global civil society. The most empirical trend since the end of the Cold War would be the development of a global civil society, bringing with it new ways of doing politics or establishing moral political communities. (Baker and Chandler, 2005) Similarly, according to Keane (2003), "global civil society" emerged in the 1980s and was very popular in the 1990s. He states that after the Prague Spring, the Central and Eastern Europe was the cradle of these three new ideas: global, civil and societal. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned"?Get the original essayAccording to Kaldor (2003), in contrast, the term "global civil society" is only really used in the last ten recent years. years; although Kant raised the possibility of a universal civil society. Thus, it is possible to emphasize global civil society with different approaches such as philosophical, economic or social. If we look at the philosophical development of global civil society, we should mention Kaldor. Kaldor (2003) argues that for early modern thinkers, civil society and the state had the same meaning. Civil society was a type of state characterized by a social contract. Civil society is a society governed by laws, founded on the principle of equality before the law, which implies that everyone is subject to the law. After the 19th century, civil society became something distinct from the state. Hegel defined civil society as the intermediate space between the family and the state, where the individual becomes a public person and, through his membership in various institutions, is able to reconcile the particular and the universal. Hegel's definition of civil society included the economy and was to be taken up by Marx and Engels, who saw civil society as the "theater of history." Later, the definition was changed in the 20th century. Civil society was understood as a space not only between the state and the family, but occupying a space outside the market, the state and the family. The Italian Marxist Antonio Gramsci asserted that there was a genuine relationship between the state and distinguished between hegemony, based on consent, and domination, based on coercion. Although there are many different definitions, each definition also has several commonalities. It was a society governed by rules based on the consent of individuals, a society based on a social contract between individuals. The meaning of civil society has changed over the course of historical events. For example, in the early modern period, the primary concern was freedom from civil rights in the face of fear. Civil society was therefore a society where laws replaced physical coercion, arbitrary arrests, etc. In the 19th century, when the questions that arose concerned more the political rights and the characteristics of the actors belonging to this type of civil society, the society was.