Environmental ethics can refer to the morals and perceptions of the human race aimed at maintaining the well-being of natural biodiversity and making life generally admirable for survival. These notions must be reinforced and promoted to ensure that natural biodiversity is supported and fully protected during its existence. The question “Do you beings have the morals or ethics to care for other life forms” is critically addressed in terms of perceptions of the world. In fact, the issue is open to debate due to differences in cultures and views on the human race as superman. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an original essay In reality, men should take care of natural environments and their compositions because of their capacity for reasoning and judgment. For example, it costs nothing to protect natural environments such as the world's rainforests. It is a natural resource which must be protected by all means in order to limit the consequences which could result in the event of destruction. It is very clear that deforestation will result in insufficient precipitation and an imbalance of atmospheric gases such as oxygen and carbon dioxide. Since trees are the main consumers of carbon dioxide, it is necessary to protect the earth's vegetation cover. These human activities have therefore had a considerable impact on natural resources, leading to their exhaustion and scarcity. This goal can be easily achieved if policies against environmental degradation and pollution are put in place to curb the illegal activities of the human race on non-human environments. Additionally, the second part of the assignment answers the question "What does environmental ethics mean to me?" » Also in the first chapter of “Earthcare”, the term environmental ethics is further explored by analyzing the moral ethics necessary to care for the Earth's natural resources. It can refer to people's concrete morality to facilitate and improve survival in various societies. Different societies have different cultures and perceptions of natural biodiversity and all that it entails. To alleviate pressures on disappearing natural resources, man must respect and be sufficiently prepared to protect the earth's resources by all means. Moral values ​​and opinions of people should be positive towards environmental conservation. They should understand that human life depends solely on the natural resources of the earth. Likewise, it should be taken into consideration that the consequences of not taking care of the earth and its compositions are very brutal and can even lead to death if not managed well. For example, the destruction of the ozone layer due to toxic emissions will pave the way for ultraviolet rays that are very dangerous for the human species in terms of global warming. Basically, this environmental ethic is very essential in terms of survival and conservation of the environment. If we do not implement them, then the Earth will be subjected to many challenges, making life unbearable and difficult enough to manage. The interaction between humanity and the environment must be friendly in order to improve and promote survival. However, it has been realized that due to dynamic changes in the world, the core values ​​ofLong-standing traditions have been betrayed by unique environmental behaviors. Likewise, the attributes attributed to certain traditional values ​​are disastrous for natural biodiversity and even pose the greatest threat to future survival. Ethical studies and justifications are the key to conserving and managing our natural ecosystems without resorting to westernized culture such as industrialization which has always been the greatest threat to Earth's natural resources. According to chapter two of Clowney's book "Earth Care", different worldviews were discussed based on Abrahamic religious beliefs and environment. It gives clear concepts on how religions such as Christianity, Islam and Judaism should be at the forefront in preserving the environment. All these religions are trying their best to promote the concept of environmentalism to ensure that natural biodiversity is not lost. Among the three religions, I would like to critically analyze the concept of environmentalism based on Christianity. Fundamentally, the essence of using environmental ethics is to ensure that scarce natural resources do not disappear completely. Most Christian scholars, such as medieval theologians and modern philosophers, have contributed greatly to the respect and conservation of environmental resources. In fact, most of them, like Brian Walsh and Nik Ansell, base their attitudes on forestry on strong biblical texts that tend to pay homage to God's creation. They promote it because of the biblical teachings that all natural resources on the planet belong to the Supreme Being and therefore the environment must be protected by all means. For example, according to the first chapter of Genesis, there is a clear account of the story of creation and how humanity was created, giving them the power to rule and care for other natural resources . But we see the harmony between God and humanity broken because of their fall. The Bible brings out an ideal understanding of what the teachings are supposed to contain in terms of nature. God himself cherished his creation and everything in it, which inspired the rabbis to continue to motivate modern environmentalists to ensure that the relationship between humanity and the environment is very positive. However, according to these two chapters of the Bible, critics tend to argue that parochial hierarchy results in humanity's subjugation to nature. For verses that show God's blessing on humanity and authority to govern all other life forms and all earthly resources held. Likewise, in accordance with pages 62-71 and 82-90 of chapter two of this book, I would like to compare and contrast environmental worldviews based on the Christian and Jewish religions. Both religions support environmental ethics, but again they tend to differ on certain factors based on religious affiliations. For example, the brutal treatment of animals is very present in the Jewish diet. Inflicting pain on living beings is strongly prohibited in both religions. Several biblical texts like Deuteronomy 22:6 give clear information on how humanity should not inflict suffering on other living beings. It is also one of the seven commandments of Jewish tradition. Both religions are still at the forefront of condemning the inhumane killings of birds and animals. Instead, they tend to view kindness toward animals as one of the best rewards that.