-
Essay / Legality of abortion and its legal continuity
Mother Teresa once said: “The greatest destroyer of peace today is abortion, because it is war against the child, murder direct of the innocent child, the murder by the mother herself; and if we can accept that a mother can kill even her own child, how can we tell others not to kill each other. » Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get the original essay Abortion refers to the termination of pregnancy at any stage that does not result in birth; Medically, abortion is generally defined as the termination of pregnancy by removal or expulsion from the uterus of a fetus or embryo before fetal viability. An abortion can occur spontaneously, in which case it is usually called a miscarriage, or it can be intentionally induced. The term abortion most often refers to the induced abortion of a human rather than a non-human pregnancy. The subject of abortion has always been controversial, with some believing that it should not be performed, others believing that such an operation could be justified. But whatever the situation, there is never an acceptable reason to have an abortion. Whether or not one agrees with the idea of abortion can be determined by a number of factors. These factors include moral and/or religious beliefs, health conditions or human rights reasons. The main focus of this article will be that, from a humanitarian point of view, abortion refers to human rights as they relate to the rights to liberty and security of life, to freedom of life and the pursuit of happiness, to therapeutic abortion to the extent that they violate the right to liberty. cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment, abortion for social and economic reasons and in situations of rape and incest. Abortion is considered wrong in the sense that every human being has the right to “life, liberty and security.” Therefore, if one accepts that the unborn child is a human being, which I do, it follows that he or she is entitled to the protection afforded by these rights. It can be argued that the human fetus is fragile, vulnerable and inconspicuous, but this gives no reason to ignore or override that fetus' right to life. Failure to protect the fetus would mean that the rights of individuals are only recognized to those who exercise supremacy or stand out. The right to life is extended to all times, we are informed of this. If this right is considered non-obligatory or relative depending on the circumstances because they differ from time to time, then each individual may find themselves excluded from the protection conferred by the right to life. Is it then still thinkable that abortion is a good thing? I don't think so. If a woman's life is threatened by her unborn child, is abortion considered a woman's right? Some will say that the mother is already alive, why give up her right to life and not the child who does not yet have life. But how do we determine when life begins? Many consider abortion to be right if the unborn child is not six months old, suggesting that a fetus's life begins at six months. In my opinion, the life of the fetus begins the moment conception takes place. This would make abortion wrong. In the 1959 UN Declaration of the Rights of the Child, the law states in its preamble that "The child, because of his physical and mental immaturity, needs special safeguards and care, including protection appropriate legal framework, before and after birth. This recognizes theright of the child, the day before its birth, which suggests that the fetus is alive and has the right to life. Therefore, abortion is not an act that should be tolerated. On the other hand, one could argue that abortion is indeed a right. ……. States that every individual shall always enjoy all human rights, unless his or her existence interferes with the rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness of an already existing conscious human being. Taking this into consideration, it can be suggested that any woman who experiences a problem, a pregnancy which interferes with her freedom of life or her happiness, then has the right to have an abortion if she wishes. It is also argued that in these cases of therapeutic abortion, if the woman is prohibited from carrying out this act, this infringes on that person's right to be free from cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment. This may seem right to some, but it is still wrong because no one can give life and therefore has no right to take life. In my opinion, if a woman commits an abortion, it should be considered murder and therefore punishable for such an act. Those responsible for inciting abortion should also be charged with conspiracy to murder. The most common reason women cited for having an abortion was to postpone pregnancy until a more appropriate time or to focus their energies and resources on existing children. The most commonly cited reasons were socio-economic factors such as not being able to afford a child, either in terms of direct costs of raising a child or loss of income during her caring for the child, lack of support from the father, inability to pay. additional children, desire to send existing children to school, interruption of education, relationship problems with a husband or partner, perception that she is too young and unemployment. We would agree that in the case where a person becomes pregnant and sees no possible outcome because he is unemployed and does not know who the father of the child could be, then an abortion would be preferable because this child would only come into the world to suffer. in the hands of poverty. But is it true? Women need to be more humanitarian and less selfish with these babies. It's like being unwanted is such a bad thing. If I had to choose between being alive and unwanted and dying in such a situation, I would rather be unwanted and alive and I'm sure many other people share my opinion. Another instance in which abortion is considered a right is in cases involving rape and incest. Most women who find themselves in such a situation believe that it is their right to have an abortion. It is understandable that a person would be raped and refuse to keep that child because the idea of bringing that child into the world due to the circumstances can cause mental and emotional issues for the mother. But from the moment one is a victim of rape, the decision is made whether the child is wanted or not. Therefore, in the event that a decision is made against chills, that person can use an emergency contraceptive to avoid pregnancy, thus avoiding conception and, therefore, the horrible act of abortion. Abortion is a civil right. Allowing abortion would deny a large part of the right. population of their fundamental human rights. States are responsible for protecting the rights of their citizens and therefore should not legalize abortion. Legalizing abortion would mean abandoning this most fundamental human right, the right to life, of an entire class of human beings, to the brutal power of those who would kill them. Making abortion illegal is.