After America gained independence from Great Britain in 1776, it needed something to bring the colonies together into one entity. They needed the feeling of a unified government. For this reason, the Articles of Confederation were written and constitute the first constitution of the United States. Although it was essentially the first constitution of the country, it was by no means a good constitution. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an original essayThe Articles of Confederation had many problems. The amendments were almost impossible because all thirteen states had to come to an agreement to implement them. In the case of small legislation, things were not as difficult as an amendment, but they were far from easy. For a small piece of legislation to pass, nine of the thirteen states had to agree. The government couldn't force you to do anything, it could only ask you to do it. The so-called government had no power to tax or recruit the people. Because they did not have the right to tax or write bills of exchange, there was no money to pay off the national debt of the United States and, as a result, they found themselves stuck in a state of national debt. There was no executive branch, so no one to enforce the law, so the entire country lived in a constant state of chaos. No one had absolutely any control over the states. If a conflict were to break out, it would most certainly be a large-scale conflict and, furthermore, an armed conflict. And that's exactly what happened. Daniel Shay was a Revolutionary War veteran. The United States didn't have the money to pay all these veterans, so they gave them war bonds and promised they would get their money back when they deposited their bonds in the bank. The longer you held your bond, the more interest it earned and the more money you made. But that didn't happen. The bank refused Shay's bail as well as everyone else's, which was a major turning point. Many of the men were farmers and these farmers had no money to pay off the debts on their farms, and the bank began to take over their farms. These men tried to explain that if the bank accepted their obligations, then they could afford to repay their debts, but the bank always refused. These men gathered in an armed protest that lasted about six months in an effort to stop the court from sending innocent men to prison for their debts. Shay's Rebellion showed many problems with the government and the weakness of the Articles of Confederation and is considered the main reason the new constitution was written and the fall of the Articles. Shay's Rebellion, however, could not take all the credit for the failure of the Articles of Confederation. Poor international relations and the rural-urban divide also played a significant role in the Articles' downfall. After the new Constitution was written, James Madison, John Jay, and Alexander Hamilton edited the Federalist Papers. Federalists could be considered nationalists. The Federalists wanted a strong central government with very weak state governments. Benjamin Franklin, John Madison, Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, and George Washington were key Federalists. These menwere perhaps the leading Federalists, but they had many supporters to accompany them. The support that the Federalists received was concentrated largely in urban areas. Federalists favored the Constitution and believed that it was in fact sufficient to protect the individual rights of the American people. The Anti-Federalists could not have disagreed more. John Hancock, Patrick Henry, Richard Henry Lee, George Mason, and Mercy Otis Warren were leading Anti-Federalists who gained support largely from very rural areas composed primarily of farmers. These Anti-Federalists wanted the power to be in the state government and not the central government. The Anti-Federalist party believed that the Constitution was in no way sufficient and favored the Articles of Confederation. Because the Anti-Federalists failed to create an organized party in all 13 states, they simply had to try to fight ratification at every state meeting. Alexander Hamilton, better known as Publius in the Federalist papers, is the author of both Federalist Papers Numbers 78 and 79. At the beginning of the article, Hamilton discusses the importance of the judiciary. According to his beliefs, the judiciary is the weakest branch in the entire government because he believed that the judiciary is not involved in activities related to government responsibilities and only has the power to judge . They have no power over money or the army. Hamilton told people that no matter how unfairly the court may treat you, it can never infringe or threaten your freedom. The Constitution states that judges will serve their entire lives if they behave well. The only way a judge can be removed from office is if he commits a serious crime. Hamilton says learning and perfecting the craft of judging takes a lifetime. There is therefore no reason why a judge should not serve his term for life. Hamilton is basically mocking anyone who thinks the idea of ​​judges holding office for life is a bad idea. Judges appointed for life free them from political pressure or influence in one direction or the other. Even though the judges serving life sentences were good, the judiciary remained the weakest. Judicial review is still part of the Constitution, but it goes too far against democracy. According to Hamilton, all responsibility should be left to the elite and no one else. Although we do not know exactly who wrote Anti-Federalist Journals Numbers 78 and 79, we do know that he is referred to as Brutus in these journals. Brutus says the Supreme Court will rank higher than anyone else in the government system. Therefore, there will be no power over the judges, and no one will be able to control their decisions, which will cause the judges to have too much weight and control the legislative power. Brutus said: "I do not object to judges holding their commissions for good behavior." But while he thought judges serving life sentences were responsible, he disagreed that judges should be so independent and that this was too much like the English government. Everyone needs a leader or someone to help them stay on track, and he believed that since these judges had no power above them, they were far too independent. According to Brutus, all responsibilities should be in the hands of the people and have nothing to do with the judiciary. Judicial review is a key aspect in both of these articles and Hamilton and Brutus agreed that the judiciary should be independent, but nothing else was agreed between the.