-
Essay / An Inspector Calls: An Analysis of Inspector Goole
The inspector introduces himself as Inspector Goole, a police officer who has come to examine a young woman called Eva Smith/Daisy Renton. Halfway through the first act, when the inspector arrives, JB Priestley describes him as a "massive, strong, determined" man, showing that he is an imposing figure who will control the play and also be the center of it. plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an original essayThe inspector also knows how to make an entrance and exit. First, he interrupts the Birling family reunion, showing that his timing is crucial. Priestley asks the inspector to ring the bell just as Arthur says "a man must mind his own business". It’s as if Birling’s statement summons the inspector to prove the exact opposite. The inspector uses exits as a clever tactic. At the end of the first act, the inspector leaves Sheila and Gerald alone together, which allows Sheila to question Gerald and gives time for distrust to separate them. The stage directions where "while Eric moves, the inspector looks from Sheila to Gerald, then exits with Eric". This also makes it easier to make Gerald confess when the inspector returns. The inspector says that if the Birlings don't learn their lesson, they will learn it in "Fire, Blood and Anguish". After his last outing, there is a sudden silence as no one else speaks. The audience, like the characters on stage, finds themselves “starred, controlled and questioned”. The inspector arrives very unexpectedly, which shows that he is a mysterious man. That is why, in the last act, Mr. Birling says: "Was it a hoax?" He is described as authoritarian and imposing. He's not a big man, but his presence fills the room. Inspector Goole came to the house to stir the Birlings' conscience. He does this when he first mentions what happened to Daisy Renton, it is an example of emotive language: “Two hours ago a young woman died in the infirmary. She had been taken there that afternoon because she had swallowed a lot of strong disinfectant. I burned it from top to bottom, of course. He says it now lies “with a burnt interior on a slab.” This has been mentioned several times, which is shocking to the public and should be shocking to the Birlings as well. Sheila and Eric are the characters most affected by what the Inspector says, unlike their parents. His “Authority” reinforces his strong ethical tone. He makes sure everyone recognizes that he is in charge; he does this by showing that he is unimpressed with Mr Birling's achievements, but also by interrupting him "massively", meaning he cuts off the dialogue "authoritatively". His authority makes people take him more seriously and makes everything he says seem more important. The inspector turns out to be more ruthless towards some people than others. For example, Mr and Mrs Birling need firmer treatment. Firstly, he answers his own questions, for example when Sybil refuses to admit that there was a committee meeting, he says: "You know very well that there was, Mrs Birling", this shows that if he doesn't like their answers, he will answer for them. Second, in order to piece together his confession, he asks question after question, for example when Sybil doesn't say that she convinced the committee to reject Eva Smith's application, he asks "Was it your influence or not?" Finally, he says he found “a sort of diary” written by Daisy/Eva. The Inspector is the driving force of the play because he is the one who asks the questions but he knows all the answers. The inspector forces.