The article “From folklore to revolution: Charivaris and the rebellion of Lower Canada of 1837”, written by Allan Greer, is the one I chose to review. The thesis written by the author comes back to the same point, namely that the charivaris were a device used by the Lower Canadians to rebel against the colonial government of the time. The argument Greer used to support his thesis was that the charivari were deployed more or less to eradicate local government. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”?Get Original Essay “By the second week of November, there was, for all intents and purposes, no official government presence in most populated rural parishes in the Montreal district, and an elective magistracy and militia began to operate in its place. This quote represents the power of political hullabaloo towards the end, but the first signs of this hullabaloo were explained earlier in the article. “The central development of this period – which led inexorably to armed confrontation – was the collapse of local administration in the western Lower Canada countryside. This quote explains how political charivari succeeded in their missions to break up local governments. It also shows the clashes they took part in, which show the violent side of the political hullabaloo. Another statement to support his thesis was: “The governor responded to this blatant defiance by dismissing “disloyal” magistrates and officers. Denouncing this decision as further proof of British tyranny, the Patriots who held the Queen's commission but who had been neglected during the purge made a grand show of resignation. The actions committed by the charivaris led to a further collapse of local administration led by government officials. The political rigmarole rebelled to the point that government officials were asked to resign because they were disrupting their lives to such an extent that it was the only option. This was supported in the article as it stated: “They were all appointed by the governor but they were definitely members of the communities they administered. Indeed, residents found various ways of “domesticating” officials who appeared in theory as agents of an external power. where the population was predominantly hostile to the government. From the Patriots' point of view, these resistance fighters were willing agents of despotism and rebels against emerging local regimes. This shows that political charivari was considered a strong rising power, as there were not many officials left and those who did so were considered the enemies of all. Coming back to the author's thesis, the charivaris of 1837 were a tool used against the colonial government of Lower Canada and the latter did so by eradicating local administration in great strides. The author's main argument is that the population of Lower Canada agreed with the use of charivari for political reasons. This point was not developed by the author until he explained the rebellion of 1837. The first time he mentioned this event was on page 10 when he said: " The Lower Canada Crisis of 1837, which culminated in an armed insurrection in November. and December of the same year, was born from the campaign for colonial autonomy and democratic reform led by the bourgeois radicals of the “Patriot Party”. Thanks mainly to the constant electoral support of the majority of the French Canadian population,.