-
Essay / The Human Dilemma of Giving Up The Idea of Giving Up
We humans are projected towards the concept of striving in order to obtain our respective desires and goals during our lives. There has always been an implication that we are obligated to make an effort to achieve the desires we aim for in life. However, the true probability remains existing and it states that we are subject to encounter difficulties during our existence. This then brings us to one of the biggest dilemmas we encounter whenever the thought of giving up arises, the thought of perseverance. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an Original EssayIn general, individuals are inclined towards the idea of not giving up. We remember that time in our lives when we had trouble understanding a certain lesson, but we still tried to learn it because we wanted to succeed. Think back to that time when we were not on good terms with our colleagues, but we still endured and coped with an unbearable environment. And it doesn't stop there, because the concept of persistence is not only embodied in these situations. In fact, there are an infinite number of possible situations that represent those moments when the strong desire to quit arose, but we still ignored it and continued. With this I realized I was wondering why do people refuse to give up when can we really if we choose to? Why do we keep going if we can just stop? Is it because giving up is really bad? The well-known quote that says “try and try until you succeed” is famous because it strongly signifies an optimistic view that to achieve our personal goals, we must work hard to achieve them. . It is seen as extreme motivation to continue despite the difficulties we encounter. It also somehow announces that the concept of abandonment will always be doomed because there must always be a way for us to realize these aspirations. Therefore, the widespread belief announces that giving up is not a decent choice because it rejects the feeling of hope, which many people perceive as a positive thing. However, the existence of the great certainty that each of us will face failure is absolute. And because we are all susceptible to losing, it proves that no matter how hard we try, we will still suffer defeat and despair. In this case, it then states the frightening truth that even though we try our best, we are all very sensitive to the concept of loss, no matter who we are. So this means that failure is always present and this only reinforces the statement that we can give up at any time if we want to. But it doesn't happen that way, because if we observe carefully, humans are always trying to keep going. What pushes us to continue despite all this then? The French-Algerian philosopher Albert Camus brought us the concept that even before we were born, we already had an essence. The essence he infers is the absurd, explained as the conflict of humans to find meaning in life and the strong desire to then create it once one realizes that the meaning devoured is non-existent. It implies that life has no meaning and that we can never create one, no matter how hard we try. So does this mean that even if we achieve our dreams or ultimate goals in life: graduating summa cum laude, earning a major honorary title, receiving a skyrocketing salary, or staying rich for the rest of ourlife ; Would our life always remain meaningless? If that's the case, what's the point of trying then? How is it then, if no matter how hard we try; we still can't make sense of our lives? In Camus's position, he asserts that in order for us to endure this meaningless life, we must only rejoice in everything, even if it makes no sense, because that is the only choice we have left. Looking carefully, it is never proven that our lives do not have meaning. Pleasant however. Even though Camus' idea of the absurd is considered real, it has never been stated that a valueless life is not a good life, as these are two different concepts. In this case, we will next consider the concept which is the person's need for pleasure. Imagine a scenario in which a student who is obviously deficient in something (a certain subject at school for example) gets the highest score in their entire class. If this accomplishment remains worthless, we will never discount the fact that the student still felt a sense of pride and pleasure with this accomplishment. While this example fails to define the student's value and meaning as a person, it does not necessarily reject the fact that the student still feels joy from it. Then it only highlights that the pleasure we experience in life acts as the strongest factor that pushes us to strive and continue regardless of the presence of quitting. Furthermore, we do everything to maximize the idea of pleasure in order to minimize the realization that we, the things we do, the achievements we obtain, our own existence and everything around us will remain infinitely worthless. Here again, we crave the feeling of pleasure, not the real meaning of our life. This has a valid meaning that somehow proves that pleasure is a solid factor that explains why we continue despite the difficulties that life brings us. On a different note, again visualize the scenario in which we graduate, earn a major honorary title, and become rich. And if we say that the sense of fulfillment obtained through these achievements is ultimately enough for a person, that the person has finally reached the ultimatum of his own pleasure because he has obtained these things; Is it possible that they can now accept the idea of giving up? Essentially, if we are only talking about pleasure, we can also conclude that it is now possible for us to give in to the idea of quitting and stop trying so hard. This is because pleasure cannot be the only root. An important point we need to consider is that humans have different perspectives and preferences in life. So it's still possible that I'm actually a kind of person who happily rejects all affiliation. Maybe it’s because I’m not a person who doesn’t totally want it. What if I just wanted to live a simple life, a peaceful life without wanting many unnecessary things? What if getting a Latin honor and being rich isn't my goal in life? A big argument that proves this is the presence of certain religions and ways of life, such as Buddhism and Taoism. For Buddhism, one of its major beliefs, as stated by their "Four Noble Truths", is samudaya, stating that desire is the cause. of all suffering. So, if I am a monk or a person who has renounced worldly life and joined the mendicant and contemplative community, I am required to live in moderation because it is believed that this is the only solution to avoid suffering. This then forces me to stop desiring the things of the world, because they are the cause of the endless suffering of-450095