With different interpretations of the Second Amendment, as well as different opinions on whether people want to support or abolish it, different questions may arise as to why it became an amendment, especially the second. all, as well as questions about who and what it helps as well as how it can harm people. By researching and asking ourselves these questions, we can find the answers to support our beliefs and show how they relate to our current times. From why it was founded, to the importance of the Second Amendment, to how it affects people on a daily basis. Say no to plagiarism. Get a custom essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”?Get the original essayThe Second Amendment is a controversial topic among many, whether they want it gone completely, those who want it for hunting and others who want it. to protect themselves from external threats weighing on themselves. The reason why it was founded and placed as the second most important amendment, as well as the number of court decisions on citizens' rights have been taken away from them willingly or unknowingly. Even more mass shootings have occurred in recent decades, and guns from law-abiding citizens have been taken away under laws intended to protect others. These are frequently asked questions, whether or not they can be answered. During the early colonies and Revolutionary War, the reasoning for why the Founding Fathers created the Second Amendment can be explained in many ways and through different opinions. Our Founding Fathers had a purpose in creating the 2nd Amendment, primarily for self-defense. Stating “A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.” » Some say that the phrase "the right of the people to keep and bear Arms" refers to the individual constitutional right to own firearms. While others believe that the phrase "a well-regulated militia, necessary to the security of a free state" refers to the state's constitutional right to have a militia. The citizens were ordered by General Gage in 1775 to surrender all arms in Boston. During the tour, citizens returned 38 blunderbusses, 634 pistols, 973 bayonets and 1,778 muskets and were promised that they would eventually be returned. After the Constitution was ratified, James Madison proposed the 2nd Amendment to give states more power in their militias. It was once common ground between Federalists – citizens who supported the Constitution, and Anti-Federalists – citizens who opposed the Constitution. The reason is that the colonists had just repulsed the English using their own muzzle-loaded rifles. The 2nd Amendment therefore gave them a chance to be able to defend themselves and fight a tyrannical government (Brooks, 2017). If those were the reasons they created the second amendment, then what was the reason it was the second most important. For what the framers of the constitution had to go through, one can see why they would have done so. as the second most important amendment to the Bill of Rights. The framers of the Constitution saw the importance of placing the 2nd Amendment as our number two, right behind the 1st Amendment, which protects freedom of the press, religion, speech, etc. After having to defend against the British army, the most feared army in the world, and fight against theking so that they could have their own rights to their new country, the founding fathers had to include a ruling defending their right to defend. themselves. When the Founding Fathers founded their own government, they wanted to be sure that their right to keep and bear arms was preserved. As an American, you have a natural right to defend yourself and your property against anything tyrannical, whether foreign or domestic. In the Bill of Rights, the 2nd Amendment was included to further address the concerns of citizens of all states. Based on what they experienced, how can the second amendment guarantee someone's individual right. How does the Second Amendment guarantee a citizen's right to own firearms, including for purposes of self-defense and hunting. The 2nd Amendment can have many interpretations for many different people depending on their ideology and opinions on the subject. For 200 years or more, with much debate and even more legislative action, no real resolution has been reached by the courts on the rights protected by the 2nd Amendment, whether purchasing, transportation and possession of firearms and their regulations. The 2nd Amendment has two parts, the initial clause which states: "A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State", which can give meaning to a state's constitutional right, and the ending being: “the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed,” which can give meaning to the personal constitutional right of citizens. Although the Second Amendment guarantees the individual rights of citizens, as a state it guarantees the rights of its own militia. How does the Second Amendment guarantee a state's right to a militia, even after the Revolutionary War, how can the Second Amendment protect that right. Declaring of the 2nd Amendment that “a well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State.” Under Section 1, Section 8 provided constitutional control to discipline, organize, and arm the federal militia. In addition to controlling the power of the federal government, the 2nd Amendment also gives governments within states the power to oppose the general government in cases of tyranny, in what Luther Martin (1744/48-1826) referred to as “last blow of grace”. It also states the constitutional rule of militaristic virtue of ancient Rome and Floratina that every citizen is a soldier and vice versa. Since the adoption of the Second Amendment, courts have always ruled on what is right and wrong. How the Supreme Court has ruled on how the Second Amendment should be put into practice over the past several decades, whether owning something specific or for defensive use. Before 2008, when the trial took place, the District of Columbia had a law prohibiting the carrying of an unregistered firearm and prohibiting the registration of all handguns. It also allows the police chief to issue one-year licenses, while no one can hold one without one. It also requires all civilians who legally possess a firearm to be unloaded, fully disassembled and stored, or have a trigger lock. A District of Columbia police officer wanted and attempted to register a handgun for use at home, but the District rejected it. The officer filed a lawsuit, claiming that because of the Second Amendment, the law went against the Second Amendment rights of all citizens. The District of Columbia court dismissed the lawsuit, but the Circuit reversed the decision, holding thatthe Second Amendment protects citizens' rights to own and possess firearms and that the District bans handguns entirely, along with regulations on firearms kept in homes deemed unconstitutional. In 1982, Chicago passed a law banning the registration of handguns and making registration a prerequisite to owning a firearm. The case occurred in 2008 when Otis Mcdonald and others filed a lawsuit against Chicago. Each lawsuit alleged that the law passed in Chicago violated a citizen's right to keep and bear arms and firearms, which the Court found protected by the Second Amendment. In 2016, a man named Jamie Caetona was convicted of possessing a stun gun in Massachusetts. Jamie Caetona appealed the state court, claiming his conviction was a violation of his Second Amendment rights. The Massachusetts Supreme Court ruled that the stun gun used by JamieCaetona was in possession and was not protected by the Second Amendment. The United States Supreme Court held that the Second Amendment effectively protects one's right to own a stun gun because the Second Amendment extends to weapons that did not exist. In New York State, you must obtain a license to own a firearm. To obtain a firearm permit, you must obtain it from the local permitting officer, which in New York is the police commissioner. The law allows two types of licenses, one being the transportation license and the other being the premises license. This case concerns the local side of the permit, that is, the fact that persons with permits can only take their handguns, unloaded and locked in a holster, equally and from their home to the one of the city's seven shooting ranges. They are not allowed to take this handgun outside of city premises or into other homes that the person may own. This case opened in 2019 and has not yet been resolved. Thanks to the Second Amendment, criminals were given a way to commit crimes and murders more easily and cause more deaths more easily. The cause of mass shootings over the decades can come from a multitude of reasons, all stemming from the use of the Second Amendment. Mass shootings, once a rare event, now occur more frequently in the United States. With each mass shooting, citizens and political figures increasingly accept possible solutions to address more concerns about mental health and restrictive gun control. Mental illness has recently become the number one issue people believe causes mass shootings. In reality, about three to five percent of all violent crimes, including mass shootings, can be linked to mental illness. Another area that people tend to blame would be video games, where through research no connection has been found between video games and gun ownership. The final area of ​​blame would be gun laws. It showed that states that have looser gun laws, which are not as strict as other states, have more gun violence than states that have stricter gun laws ( Understanding Gun Violence and Mass Shootings, 2019). Senseless gun violence has always occurred, today and in the past. If the United States abolished the Second Amendment, the use of guns in senseless violence would have the potential to decrease. Violence.