In the context of Freshers, goal setting theory seems to be a good motivation theory at play. Locke and Latham, 1990 define that goal setting of goals has two implications: it provides a basis for behavior and guides behavior, the theory assumes that all humans are rational beings. The basic idea is that goal setting focuses people's attention on the goal and puts them in a position to evaluate their abilities in setting those goals, inspiring them to work hard to achieve the goal in order to avoiding failure in achieving the goal, since the goal also defines performance measures required for success, acceptance of these goals as one's own is called goal commitment. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an original essayIn the context of Freshers whose initial goal in relation to society is to succeed as debaters and acquire the skills exclusive to debate - seniors often set goals for students - to 'break', c i.e. reaching a particular stage in a tournament, either as a debater or as a referee, these objectives are although set for beginners in general, but they also take into consideration the individual differences of each member when assigning objectives – which are judged again, based on the “inputs” of the most recent and generic discussions with them, the last and probably related to the Freshers is the idea of ​​“Feedback” – not only do the newbies receive quantitative feedback in terms of wins-losses during a tournament, but they also get abundant qualitative feedback internally from the seniors during simulations but also from other members of the circuit during tournaments - the beauty of this feedback lies in their objectivity, the convincing capacity of the referee who is generally a senior and the personalized nature of the feedback which allows people to not only improve as a group but also as individual debaters; although peer feedback plays a role, the fact that seniors give qualitative feedback adds additional legitimacy. In relation to seniors and progressively with newcomers as they spend a little time in the circuit, the theory of motivation reinforcement also becomes focused on behavior; although the theory is at odds with goal-setting theory, philosophically, since one takes a behaviorist approach while the other takes a cognitive approach and, according to Robbins and Judge, is not concerned not the initiation of behavior, and therefore it is not, according to them, a theory of motivation. However, because it provides a powerful way to analyze what controls behavior, it ends up guiding discourse within the organization. That said, reinforcement in the context of the English Debating Society, JMC includes internal appreciation of people with high simulated participation, recognition of individual efforts regardless of victories or defeats, posts of appreciation on the Facebook page official, peer reinforcement in terms of periodic and specific constructive comments, etc. Along with this recognition in the circuit and tournament wins, plus the added incentive in the form of cash prizes, this is a good boost for a few members. It is important that this clarification exists and explains why goal setting theory takes a back seat to “.