For a long time, people have debated each other's opinions. However, the Internet, and primarily social media, has transformed how, when, and where such discussions take place. The number of people who can go online and condemn others for their engagements or remarks is enormous and forming organizations to engage in open conflict has never been easier. There is no universally accepted clarification of cancel culture, but in its most extreme form, it involves irresponsible people actually exerting tension to condemn someone for their misconceptions. Allowing an unruly mob to determine the fate of a human is tantamount to cancel culture. It suppresses free speech, prohibiting some people from expressing their beliefs for fear of personal attack. Cancel culture is a harmful, even deadly, way of cutting corners on difficult topics and promoting snap decisions that can effortlessly escalate into needlessly callous punishments in circumstances less offensive to people's mental well-being. Say no to plagiarism. Get a Custom Essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an Original Essay The label “Cancel Culture” is thought to have come from a 1980s song that used a relatively rare slang expression, “Cancel”, which indicates separating from someone. This word was then used in cinema and television, before developing and becoming known on social networks. In recent years, the concept of Cancel Culture has become a hotly debated topic in American politics. There are several disputes about what it is and what it entails, questioning whether it is a technique to hold people accountable, an approach to discipline others in an unethical manner , or a mixture of the two. Some even say that Cancel Culture does not exist. However, cancel culture, in which people and businesses are shunned due to statements, behaviors, or attitudes that some view as incorrect, is nothing new. “Fundamentally, cancel culture is about shame,” says Kimberley Wilson, a licensed psychologist, in her book How to Build a Healthy Brain. “Shame arises in response to the feeling that we have transgressed an agreed social rule and lost our status within the group.” In terms of context and consequences, Cancel Culture clearly distinguishes between shame and guilt: regret is a feeling of wrongdoing, shame is a symbol of wrongdoing, and Cancel Culture obviously evokes the latter . Kimberley Wilson argues that “social media has democratized cancel culture,” highlighting both the long history of the phenomenon and the sudden, widespread opportunity to join its trend toward censorship. As social media grows, cancel culture also expands and becomes more deeply rooted in a global perception of right and wrong. The morality and effectiveness of such a harsh moral paradigm have sparked intense discussion. Ordinary individuals who have low ability to avoid cancellation are the false indictment of cancel culture because “inequity is still a problem.” The anti-cancel culture perspective focuses on the negative consequences of this cancellation clause, which can lead to job loss, damaged reputation, and psychological problems. Is it okay to cancel in these everyday situations,when something is at stake? Is it appropriate to take a black and white view of morality, ignoring the possibility of uncertainty? These are some of the issues raised by opponents of cancel culture, and many even debate whether it in any way revolves around the concept of "morality." According to Wilson, evolutionary psychologists assume that humiliation played a role in human survival since it was once potentially lethal. do anything that might expel people from the community and “limit the scope of this dominant conception of discrimination and its tendency to marginalize those whose experiences cannot be described within narrowly defined parameters.” Even when being excluded from the community for wrongdoing has always been a possibility, even though we have generally, rightly, called attention to injustice, new media have greatly contributed to a very vicious form of violent retaliation that cause chaos on people's already fragile psychological health. By compromising the quality of one's knowledge in exchange for premature judgments, the gang mentality plays a key role. Even though George Floyd's death garnered sympathy from everyone in popular culture, if he had done something contradictory to the societal norms of the dominant culture, there is a clear likelihood that "no matter what the impact would be." Michael Brown or Breonna Taylor could have taken on a living Floyd.” , he would not be eligible to work at The Atlantic, The New York Times, HBO or Netflix.” This can have a significant impact on the minds of those who are canceled, making it much more difficult for them to rehabilitate themselves or correct their mistakes. This places a lot of pressure on the individual and exaggerates minor transgressions. Even if their error is not considered “insignificant,” pitting an entire population against a single individual over a short period of time can harm that person’s quality of life. In effect, it makes people doubt their ability to recover or correct their mistakes. Rather than teaching right or wrong and encouraging progress, cancel culture is about domination. Proponents of cancel culture simply want to control the people they cancel. The main problem is that cancel culture is usually always an effort at virtual enforcement, rather than holding those found guilty to account. Not only is it ineffective, but it also has major consequences on the mental health of all parties involved. Cancel culture doesn't care about contextual references. Let's reasonably assume that you lose your job because of a ten-year-old tweet that you have clearly and completely detached yourself from, or that you are mercilessly harassed online because of a disproportionate statement. It may seem like the person is being attacked by the whole world. As we have seen in previous examples, this is particularly detrimental to a person's psychological state and often leads to chronic hopelessness and anxiety. This is why many people refer to cancel culture and the concept of “cancelling” someone as a public uproar. Although celebrities are the most well-known examples, some have called for reality TV stars with less media support or public relations expertise to be "cancelled" for innocuous statements and behaviors that were misinterpreted during production, leading to negative effects. For example, Ellen DeGeneres, the American host, was one of the most famous cancellations of the yearprevious. It came under fire after Buzzfeed News published an article alleging that it had generated a toxic work environment among its members. Her former associates assumed that when the cameras stopped rolling, DeGeneres was no longer the same person she appeared to be on the show. Instead, one person claimed she was “dehumanizing,” and her top officials fell over themselves to live up to her famous “be kind” slogan, firing employees who took sick or bereavement leave . A former colleague helped point out that her top creators made “racist remarks” on set and were complicit in prejudice. While several former employees told Buzzfeed that top producers and on-set supervisors were responsible for the toxic environment, one former employee claimed that because Ellen's name is on the billboard, "she really must take more responsibility" for the climate that surrounds it. Ellen's show will end in 2022, even though she took full responsibility and apologized at the start of season 18. Public figures are humans too and they are entitled to the same kindness and forgiveness that we have all received from those around us. . Celebrities are hesitant to say anything out of the ordinary, for fear that it will be misconstrued as unnecessary. People are alone and lonely because of cancel culture. People are suffering from despair and anxiety due to cancel culture. Because of this, celebrities feel completely alone. Because it fails to distinguish between truly harmful acts and mistakes that anyone can make, Cancel Culture fails in its goal of holding those who are truly responsible. According to Crenshaw, “unlawful discrimination arises from the identification of a specific class or category; either a discriminator intentionally identifies that category, or a process is adopted that somehow disadvantages all members of that category.” Cancel culture, at the other extreme, doesn't believe in explanations, redemption, or regret. This is when the phenomenon turns into a major threat to mental health. Mike Thalassitis, Sophie Gradon and Caroline Flack are just three of the most recent victims in a society where the repercussions of canceling the wrong people directly led to their suicide. In a way, this is a form of discrimination against the victim. We do not need a movement that aims to hunt down and execute anyone found guilty without a clear system. No matter who you are or what your social status is, people are all subject to the same feelings. And once cancellation is initiated, it quickly turns into a process of shared harassment. This can lead people to feel alienated, alone, and ostracized, which can contribute to depression, anxiety, and other mental health problems due to "adopting a problem-discrimination framework." unique ". This is especially true if you haven't received a clear explanation as to why you are canceling, which is often the case initially. A “mistake” offers no opportunity to learn or grow, only criticism. The reason cancel culture is so destructive is that it symbolizes a kind of vigilante justice for the electronic age, akin to mob law. There are no revisions or redactions; there are no corrections or leniency "in these cases, the pattern seems to be that no driver is held accountable, no treatment is administered, and the parties involved move on, 2020.