There is, however, a distinction between moral desert and the “right to legitimate expectations” which can be described as a game of chance and a game of skill. The example Sandel uses is the “Massachusetts State Lottery.” Let's say you win the lottery, but "even if [you are] entitled to [your] winnings [...] there is no sense in which [you] are morally deserving to win in the first place." It's the right. He used the example of the Red Sox winning the World Series. “When they win, they are entitled to the trophy, but we can always ask ourselves in the game of skill: did they deserve to win?” It is important to distinguish what "someone is entitled to under the rules and whether they deserve to win in the first round ».