He remains objective about the concept of torture while keeping his lawyer's hat on. Dershowitz does this by examining the concept of torture without bias. He understands the government's position and what it would look like if they ordered torture, but we cannot allow torture to happen behind the scenes. It’s up to us as a society to come together and say what’s right and what’s wrong. Dershowitz also goes on to claim that in Israel, torture has been an effective tool for obtaining information. The United States and Israel are close allies. (Dershowitz, 2006) Did the United States benefit from information obtained under torture from Israel? Our hands are there, one way or another. Understanding that regulations are necessary for the greater good will help minimize extreme or involuntary torture. I agree that torture is inevitable, I also agree that the laws could provide a clearer picture to those involved. Define actions to take when torture is used and clearly identify when it is time to stop. Dershowitz's argument is consistent with Stuart Mills' idea of ​​consequentialism. The highest good of all is considered in the decision-making process. But Kant would say that legalizing torture does not make it morally right. Legally practicing torture remains morally reprehensible and