The polluter pays principle (PPP) essentially means that the producer of goods must be responsible for the cost of preventing any pollution caused as well as repairing it damage thus caused. It will include the full environmental costs, that is, the cost of pollution or other damage caused to the ecology, and not just those that are immediately tangible costs. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why violent video games should not be banned”?Get the original essayThe polluter pays principle is preventive and compensatory in nature. This may involve fixing the criminal liability of the polluter, forcing him to repair the damage or to pay an eco-tax or a carbon tax or at least to participate in one way or another in the preservation of the environment. The polluter pays principle has been interpreted differently depending on the country and there does not seem to be a common definition. For example, some countries impose retrospective liability on the polluter and different countries have different definitions of who is a polluter and what constitutes pollution; The range of costs borne by the polluter differs. It should also be noted that the above principle is more of a regional custom than an element of international environmental law. The name of this rule is unnecessarily restrictive if taken literally. Pollution (the harm associated with the release of waste into the environment) is just one of many forms of environmental degradation to which the rule has been applied. Initially, the PPP was interpreted only as the government not doing the cleanup work for polluters or industries. but today the scenario has changed. The most common interpretation of PPP is that outside of government, even specific polluters should take responsibility for reducing their contribution to a particular pollution problem. This is called fair internalization. Since polluters bear all costs, distortions in international trade and investment resulting from differential methods of financing pollution reduction could be eliminated through the adoption of PPP. Even with all its success in the Indian scenario, the polluter pays principle is not a cure for all. the world's environmental problems. It is only potential for problems that originate from identifiable polluters who have sufficient economic resources to pay for their expenses and even under the broadest definitions of pollution, PPP cannot help solve serious environmental problems such as the decline of biological diversity or the destruction of ecologically critical habitats. Other problems, while related to pollution, are the aggregate consequence of the disparate actions of millions of individuals simply trying to maintain their livelihoods in crowded cities or decertified rural areas. PPP would be inappropriate in such situations; these impoverished polluters are unable to pay for their contribution to the global environmental burden. Most developing countries have yet to fully embrace the polluter pays principle as a major environmental policy guideline due to the difficulty of implementing it and its vagueness. . Poor households, informal sector businesses and subsistence farmers cannot afford additional costs for waste disposal, while small and medium-sized formal sector businesses, which mainly serve the domestic market, struggle to reverberate.