blog
media download page
Essay / Get Comfortable with Discomfort: Taking Risks to Succeed The most debated question is whether taking risks is more important than making carefully planned decisions in professional life for success, or vice versa. Human resources managers often ask candidates questions to gauge their propensity for risk aversion. Although some management experts claim that accepting risks is beneficial for professionals to succeed in their careers, it is a well-established truth that success is not based on hard work alone. It also requires individuals to regularly reevaluate their agendas and, as the saying goes, “get used to discomfort.” In this essay, I would like to discuss my position on this topic. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”?Get the original essayBe Comfortable or Take RisksIn my opinion, making plans regularly is more beneficial than accepting risk for the professional success in terms of dependence on reality rather than on probability and the logic of the correlation between terror zone and comfort zone. First, opponents usually make their point through accomplished cases. However, the problem with this argument is their commitment to selection bias, which is one of the most common failures in academia. What is selection bias? This is a mistake made by a writer when selecting parochial evidence for their argument, leading to the hypothesis being considered invalid. Proponents of risk acceptance generally commit to the failure of selection bias because they illustrate their argument with successful cases, but they neglect its disastrous effects in unsuccessful cases. In short, considering risk-taking as more crucial is preferring probability over reality. Correlation between comfort zone and terror zone On the one hand, there is an exact way to pave the way to success. A zero-sum game, the game of all or nothing, in other words, success or devastation, does exist. A rational individual would naturally choose the first option, namely reality over probability. Second, the risk-accepting side of the debate corroborates their position using the psychological concepts of terror zone and comfort zone. According to psychologists, the zone of interception of the terror zone and the comfort zone is the mode in which humans are most productive. However, they miss the essential point that productivity comes from the comfort zone effect as well as the terror zone strength. This is why taking a risk, which locks you into the terror zone, cannot increase productivity. On the other hand, feeling the stress of obligations will push you into the terror zone while planning assignments pulls you into your comfort zone, hence you will stay in the position where you are most productive. Who can say that productivity leads to success?Keep in mind: This is just a sample.Get a custom paper from our expert writers now.Get a custom essayConclusionIn conclusion, the question of “acceptance risk versus careful planning” is a hot debate in the professional world. Although some say that "taking risks means you will succeed more easily than making a careful plan", the truth.. 45-60.
Navigation
« Prev
1
2
3
4
5
Next »
Get In Touch