At the end of the 19th century, American expansion cost a lot of money and the lives of so many people in unnecessary expansion to small colonized countries like the Philippines, Cuba and Puerto Rico, not only are they breaking their promise to return their independence, but they are also breaking their own principles. At that time, it was called the "era of imperialism", where many strong countries like the United States fought for countries to expand their influence. American imperialism, however, claimed that it was different from other imperialist countries in that its mission is to ensure freedom, to propagate freedom and democracy. The Philippines is one of the countries that the Americans promised to return their independence to, but in the Treaty of Paris, the Philippines was sold to America for $20 million. When the Filipinos heard about the Treaty of Paris and its conditions, they felt betrayed and vowed to fight for their freedom. Emilio Aguinaldo, a revolutionary leader who later became the first president of the Republic of the Philippines in 1898, led the fight for their independence rather than let another country colonize them again. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get the original essay The Filipinos are at a complete disadvantage in combat because American soldiers are more trained than Filipino soldiers and have a constant supply of advanced weapons than the Filipinos. The war lasted 3 years and left more than 4,200 American soldiers and 20,000 Filipino soldiers dead. The US imperialists have claimed that their mission is to spread freedom and democracy, but is this war that is taking many lives also part of their so-called mission? And is this expansion really necessary? The Philippine-American War presents many problems that may run counter to the claims of the American imperialists. US imperialists want to spread “freedom” and “democracy”, but is killing Filipino civilians and soldiers considered democracy and freedom? Where is the freedom in that? Is the killing of many civilians through violence, famine and disease freedom or democracy? Because it's obviously not a democracy, but they are declaring their absolute power in the Philippines. Many Americans also look down on Filipinos at that time, can you find freedom and democracy there? When they don't even consider Filipinos equal? Many US soldiers also allegedly raped Filipino/female civilians in the Philippines. Will you find freedom and freedom for the Philippines with these horrible cases? This obviously contradicts their assertion. They are not at all different from other imperialist countries like the previous colonial ruler of the Philippines (Spain), because these reasons are enough to prove that the Philippines will never achieve this "freedom", this "democracy" and above all this "freedom" . » This is also enough to prove that this imperialism is not right since its assertions/reasons are not at all legitimate. It was not only the Philippines, but also Puerto Rico and Cuba that were sold/given to America. They all have many different issues to consider and also contradict US imperialist claims, but there are also the same issues with the Philippines, such as the killing of soldiers/civilians, which may be common in a war, but this is still not fair. Keep in mind: this is just a sample. Get a sample now.