Liberals believe that peaceful relations between democracies exist through Democratic Peace Theory (DPT) and have faith in humanity with a positive view of human nature; unlike the realists. Realists emphasize the importance of state sovereignty and criticize liberals for being too utopian and placing individual interests ahead of collective interests. In this essay, I will critically discuss both theories and come to a conclusion on which I believe understands security better. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get the original essay Liberalism became important during the Enlightenment; attentive to the security of individuals, believing in freedom, human rights and equality, to name a few. They suggest that government is a necessary evil, necessary to protect its individuals from the harm of others, but it may actually pose a threat to liberty (Paine 1776). Their faith in humanity and positive view of human nature means they believe human reason can triumph. about the greedy desire for power. One of the key elements of liberalism is DPT, which dates back to the 1700s. DPT shows that democracies are like-minded because they share the same values; the peaceful resolution of conflicts is considered morally superior to violent behavior and therefore to acts of war, unlike realists who advocate military intervention. Liberals argue that the spread of democracy leads to greater security; however, this is mistakenly believed to mean that democratic countries never go to war. Instead, he argues that democracies do not wage war against each other. Liberals also believe in other factors than just power politics; Economic interaction and interdependence between states also play a vital role, which significantly strengthens peace and brings mutual benefits. Economic interdependence facilitates greater cooperation, reducing military conflict and making the world more secure. Ricardo said international trade is a major incentive for countries to cooperate internationally and, therefore, maintain peace. So no matter what type of state you are, whether it is a democracy or a dictatorship, it will hinder your efforts for peace. Kant's (1795) idea of ​​perpetual peace is described as "permanently established over a certain area." Perpetual peace is arguably considered the beginning of contemporary liberal thought, and it suggests that most people would not vote for war except as an act of self-defense. However, Kant goes on to say that it is nothing more than an idea, that it cannot be realized but is a constant goal that states must work towards. More recently, after September 11, the United States created a liberal international system based on multilateralism and interdependence. Ikenberry (2008) asserts that “the current Western order, in short, is hard to overthrow and easy to rejoin.” Ikenberry goes on to describe American foreign policy under Trump: “The most powerful state in the world has begun to sabotage the order it created. » The system has created economic interdependence through foreign direct investment and export markets. Overall, liberalism in the past has been beneficial and strengthened the world through international organizations like the World Bank. Today, the.