blog




  • Essay / Youth culture today: the question of raves

    Raves are nighttime parties attended by young people aged 14 to 25; they consist of DJs playing loud electronic music normally generated by computers. Raves first appeared in the mid-1980s in Britain, as after parties when clubs were closed. Since then, raves have gained popularity in many other countries around the world and have grown into a youth culture. Entrance fees to raves normally range from $5 for nighttime events, and prices have increased up to $200 for larger events. Since rave events have attracted up to 30,000 young people aged 14 to 25 in a single event, drug use at raves has also recently become a concern for parents and politicians. To make raves safer, policies were created to attempt to control rave events, and to publicize and legally hold a rave today; the promoter must hold a valid permit. Driving raves underground by banning them will only make them more dangerous because they are harder to police, so more lives are at risk. The government must take responsibility for trying to make raves safer; Rave parties should not be banned by the government. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get the original essay Bans would only force raves to take place illegally in clandestine and dangerous locations. Underground raves have proven to be far more dangerous than controlled raves. If the government banned raves, they would simply move underground, making them much more dangerous. To acquire a permit for a rave, the venue must comply with the rave protocol which has been developed to ensure the safety of rave venues. According to protocol, venues must have been surveyed well in advance of the event and must provide free running water. Basement raves have been the cause of many deaths due to lack of water, air or space. On October 10, 1999, Allan Ho, a 21-year-old Ryerson student, died of an ecstasy overdose at a rave. He attended an underground rave that took place in an abandoned warehouse with no running water and very poor ventilation. The venue was definitely not a place to hold a rave with 3,500 people, and police officials also called the venue a fire trap. Driving raves underground is dangerous. Remember, Allan Ho's death happened in a place that was unauthorized. (Chow, 2000). Since there are no regulations for raves when they take place underground, organizers normally risk everyone else's safety by turning off the running water and charging up to $5 per bottle of water. Underground raves always take place in a mysterious location that is normally only revealed a few hours before the event (Wier, 2000). Promoters do this to deter police surveillance, and so there are no police or paramedics outside the event like at controlled raves. It is better to have an ambulance, firefighters and 70 police officers on duty lined up outside, ready to respond to problems before it is too late (Levy, 2000). The presence of paramedics outside raves has already saved 21 hospitalized people who attended CNE raves over the past 3 years. The 21 people would have been found dead of drug overdoses if there had been no one there.outside to help them. The government needs to make raves safer by allowing more control instead of banning them, so that raves are forced underground, where they are more dangerous. Raves are today's youth culture and they will continue to exist even if the government tries to stop them. . In the past, youth culture has always been a concern of parents and politicians. Like rock concerts in the 70s, drugs were a problem, but stopping them wouldn't solve the problem, they might get worse. They kept going, because it was youth culture and no adult could stop it from happening. The youth cultures that existed in the past, like disco, Elvis, swing kids, and rock fans, all had their share of drugs, but they were all an expression of themselves, and politicians were not not ready to prevent people from expressing themselves freely. Raves are also seen as a way to relieve stress from the outside world, as they have attracted various people who consider themselves outcasts, but at raves, the peace, love, and unity make them feel wanted. but what struck me more than the immense sensory happiness was the incredible group of people who shared this experience with me, six thousand young and beautiful humans having a great time together. No fighting. No one is crying around here. No one is sick on the stairs. Everyone smiles. Six thousand brothers and sisters of all races, classes and sexual orientations, living equality. Beautiful. (Raver)Since their birth in Canada 10 years ago, raves have changed a lot since they began as events where a group of teenagers would bring speakers and equipment into a warehouse and break in , then party all night or until the police. introduced himself. Today, raves are organized publicly and feature incredible lasers, artificial fog, spinning records, and lots of friends to meet (Farley, 2000). The raves are unstoppable; they represent what young people are today. Raves threaten the very fabric of Canadian life (Fatino, 2000). Raves pose no threat, but banning them would destroy youth culture. Raves should not be banned, the government cannot abolish what so many people stand for, youth culture will endure. The government should not ban raves, but rather provide more control over legal raves and more education about drugs. Attempts in the past to ban raves in the UK have not been successful. After raves were banned, they gradually took over the dance club scene, dangerously mixing alcohol and drugs (Weir, 2000). The combination of alcohol and drugs poses an even greater threat to public health. Drug education is more important than trying to prevent drug use at raves, because drugs are accessible outside of raves, in places like clubs, concerts, and schools. Instead, it is more helpful to inform the public about the dangers of drugs and how much a person can take before the drug becomes a threat to their life. Toronto's municipal government has also proven that it is much safer to allow raves on municipal property than to hold raves on private property, where building standards may be minimal. A total of 14 raves have taken place on the grounds of the Canadian National Exhibition since March 1997. Data collected from 13 of them showed that a total of 298 police.