Gun control is a major national issue in America today that people are trying to settle and take sides. The issue of large mass shootings with automatic weapons and the “ease” of acquiring a firearm is central to the concerns of this topic. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get the original essay Guns have always been an important part of American society. Whether for the military, self-defense, home defense, hunting, target shooting, or even as collectibles once they become a "classic". These were the reasons guns were used, not mass shootings, police shootings, or any other type of neighborhood shootings. This brings me to my first point: some say "guns kill people, we need to ban guns." Well yes, it's true, guns have been the cause of many terrorist attacks and of course mass shootings. The number of deaths changes, the locations change: 26 in a church, 26 in an elementary school, 49 in a nightclub, 58 at a country music festival. But I promise you, if someone put a gun on a table and no one touched it, they wouldn't shoot or kill anyone. That being said, it takes a certain type of person to pick up a gun, point it in the direction of another human being, and have the decency to pull the trigger for no reason. Samuel L. Jackson said, “I don’t think it’s about more gun control. I grew up in the south with guns everywhere and we never shot anyone. These are people who are not taught the value of life.” been the focal point of the majority of terrorist attacks. These are Sandy Hook Elementary, Columbine High, Virginia Tech, Las Vegas, etc. Every time one of these attacks happens, the very first thing that comes up is gun control and how guns should be illegal. Which gives a bad name to gun owners who own “killing machines.” People only see the bad side of guns and not the good. The declaration that “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed” is the Second Amendment to the Constitution. The right of all Americans to bear arms is a right that the Founding Fathers valued as much as the Constitution itself. Gun control laws directly violate this right and therefore should not even be considered. Even though this issue is neglected, gun control advocates argue that to reduce gun violence, gun control laws must be implemented to eliminate gun violence. fire. While this may seem reasonable, the consequences of such laws are ironically counterproductive: they make the problem worse rather than solving it. Aside from the fact that the U.S. Constitution guarantees its citizens the right to bear arms, the idea of ​​restricting gun ownership in order to reduce gun violence would ultimately fail given previous control experiments firearms in England and many states. Leaders such as Kim Jong Un and Adolf Hitler, among others, have all tried to pass gun control laws in their own countries, but without success. Gun control lawsaim to restrict firearms by carefully choosing who can sell, buy and possess certain types of firearms. firearms. Criminals do not obey laws and stricter gun control laws or gun bans will have little effect on reducing crime. There are many myths that gun control will reduce gun violence, which research shows are not true. People are responsible for crimes, not the guns themselves. Taking guns away from U.S. citizens who use them for many reasons, such as target practice, competition, hunting, and self-defense, should not be punished for the actions of criminals. As Mytheos Holt said: “Guns in the right hands contribute to public safety. Guns in the wrong hands harm public safety.” Research shows that defensive gun use deters criminals and reduces crime. Not only is this wrong to decriminalize law-abiding citizens, it is against the Second Amendment. It is unconstitutional to pass laws that infringe on the right to bear arms set forth in the Second Amendment. Some people think that extremely strict gun control laws will eliminate crime, but gun control laws only stop the "good guys" from getting guns. Criminals will always have ways to obtain weapons, whether on the black market, across borders or through illegal street sales. New gun control laws won't stop them. Since the Columbine High School, Virginia Tech, and Sandy Hook shootings, the frequency of mass shootings has increased significantly. Gun control is not effective because it has not been shown to actually reduce gun-related crimes. Instead of considering a ban on private gun ownership and violation of individual property rights, it may be more practical to consider the option of partially restricting access to guns. If we look at the history of gun control in the United States, we find that laws regarding gun control are not new. In 1968, a law was passed, it was the Gun Control Act of 1968, and it was the first major gun control law in America. It barred certain people from being able to purchase firearms, including convicted felons, underage customers, people with a history of mental illness, dishonorably discharged veterans, and illegal aliens. Continuing gun control laws throughout American history, the Brady Handgun Violence Protection Act of 1993 established background checks for gun purchasers. This law was passed to ensure that no firearms would be sold to individuals listed in the 1968 regulation. These background checks are only required for sales made through licensed dealers, not for sales made through unlicensed private sellers who do not sell firearms as a business, except in certain states. Then, in 1994, a ten-year ban was placed on the production of nineteen new semi-automatic assault weapons listed under the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act. Some of these banned weapons include some versions of the AK-47, Uzi, MAC-10, and TEC-9. Along with the ban on these assault rifles, high-capacity ammunition magazines were limited to ten rounds. This ban has been lifted.