For Christina Rossetti and Carol Ann Duffy, the pursuit of love after death is apparently partly caused by the fact that the narrators express their attachment to their partners, without addressing the fear that accompanies death. In Rossetti's "Remember," written in the Victorian era, the speaker comforts his partner despite the looming prospect of death. Yet in Duffy's "Anne Hathaway," written during the postmodern period in 1990, the speaker reflects on her past relationship with her partner, describing the feelings and passion that accompanied it. Both nature and acceptance are evident in these sonnets; however, it seems that passion is more present in "Anne Hathaway" than in "Remember", as the speaker takes on a more reassuring role in "Remember". Say no to plagiarism Get a tailor-made essay. on "Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned"?Get the original essay Death is mentioned at the beginning of each poem, as Rossetti uses a euphemism in "Remember" while Duffy uses an epigraph from Shakespeare's will. This strategy creates a tone of solemnity. , because the rapid mention of death is surprising. However, the poet's progression from disappearance to eternal adoration marks the love between the speaker and his partner as momentous and interminable. Both the Victorian and Elizabethan eras were Christocentric and primarily advocated sexual discretion; However, Duffy was able to explore the zealous lustful side of Shakespeare and Hathaway's relationship through writing in a post-modernist period. In reflecting on their relationship, the speaker uses a lexical field of passion: “body, touch, bed, perfume, taste”. This usage could convey the arduous side of their relationship and allows the reader to visualize this aspect of the speaker's love. Alternatively, the use of a passionate lexical field could also suggest that the speaker is using it as a calming mechanism. This could distract the speaker from the sadness that follows death, as it describes the living aspects of their relationship. However, unlike the speaker in “Anne Hathaway,” the speaker in “Remember” infantilizes a designated partner by remarking that this individual can no longer “hold my hand.” This approach may have been affected by the context in which it was written, as many women were seen as mothers and this maternal predisposition could have extended to romantic relationships. From a feminist point of view, this could be the position that a patriarchal society would impose on a woman without giving her the opportunity to go beyond this role. On the other hand, another interpretation may suggest that the speaker of “Remember” is authoritative and authoritative. The repetition of “remember” embellishes this point because it is compelling in nature. However, this continued refrain of "remembering" could represent the speaker losing his power, gradually disappearing from life. The tactics here contrast with those of “Anne Hathaway,” where the speaker moves from discussion of nature to discussion of bodies: “In the other bed, the better one, our guests dozed off babbling their prose . The contrast could represent the guests as symbols of the rest of the prosaic world, people who have no pyrotechnic language. The speaker also suggests that her poetic love is more eloquent and imaginative than the connections of others, presenting it as a superior and unparalleled sensation. Both sonnets use nature as a platform to elevate love to a higher role. Rossetti uses a metaphor that softens the sadness of death. "Gone very far,.