First, there are many reasons why journalists have lost trust over the years and, I think, a lot of that has to do with the media social and information 24/7. 24/7 news requires a high demand for content, which means journalists have to gather information, facts and figures quickly, which means they don't always get it right . However, there is always a demand for the most recent articles, the public wants to know exactly what is happening as soon as it happens, which has caused a lack of trust within the journalistic circle. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why violent video games should not be banned”?Get an original essayIn this context, I think the quest for profit has had a huge impact on why journalists have also lost confidence. This could be because the main quest will be considered the most important and therefore the quality of journalism will be lacking. The more money is offered for an article, the more willing some are to "bend the rules" and try to obtain information in a perhaps unethical way, which in my opinion destroys trust between the public and journalists. There are many ways the media can address this issue and regain trust in journalism. For starters, the media can address the lack of trust within journalism by being completely “transparent” about the mistakes journalists make. One example was the Times' publication of an apology for writing about public health experts' "financial ties" to the tobacco industry in 2016. The apology ended with "we apologize for our errors and omissions and for the embarrassment caused. The Times showed that they accepted that they were wrong, making the public believe that if they did something wrong again they would say it openly, without transparency the public can believe everything that is written and at the future. , find out that it's not true. It is important to maintain trust between the public and journalists, not only to keep a media outlet running, but also to obtain interviews and information from members of the public. No trust means no real content. Another way the media can address the lack of trust is to obtain real evidence and reliable sources. When journalists have reliable evidence and sources, media and the public are more likely to trust the content published. If, however, they use unreliable sources, the quality of journalism is lacking, so those reading may begin to lose even more confidence. However, obtaining reliable sources can be difficult in 24/7 news because the content is constantly changing. Watchdog news is also an important aspect in which the media can help regain trust in journalism, because watchdog news takes much more time and energy to get the story and usually includes a lot of facts and figures that explain in detail what is happening. on what they publish. By creating in-depth and reliable content, the audience will have no choice but to believe what is published. Without such content, there is no proof that what is published is 100% factual. This also applies to investigative journalism. Investigative journalism is a key part of journalism that is important for maintaining trustbetween the public and the journalist, because it is only "real" journalism and generally about events that affect many people, the more real the investigative journalism, the harder. The Edelman study (Trust barometer [online]. Ebook. Edelman) on trust shows that 53% of people trust journalists, and only 35% trust platforms, for example social media. In this study, to the question "How often do you consume information produced by the main news agencies, whether original or shared?" » 50% said they disengage and consume news less than once a week. I believe that social media has had a huge effect on the trust of journalists, but I also believe that if used correctly it can help regain the trust of younger members of the public, which in turn will increase trust all over the world. Initially, fake news and social media caused a huge lack of trust within journalism, as many people cannot distinguish real from fake news. Many also assume that everything posted on social media is written by a journalist, when in reality a lot of information online can come from any member of the public. Clickbait also makes it difficult to see real news because many fake news are clicked on. If the media tackles the problem of social media, they can use it to their advantage, for example, advertising on Twitter, Instagram and Facebook gets the real deal. the media has a chance to be “heard” and will spread fake news. Regarding fake news, the Edelman study suggests that 63% of people cannot distinguish what is fake from what is real news. The media can teach the public to quantify what comes from real journalists and what comes from the general public. This way, people are less likely to believe everything they read online or on social media. Another way the media can address the lack of trust in journalists and help them regain public trust is to ensure all media outlets follow the Ofcom or Ipso codes. (except those who follow their own practices and codes, eg BBC) and as part of this, review all codes and practices within Ipso/Ofcom. This would help regain lost trust, because the public will know that all journalists are subject to the same rules and cannot act just to get a story. These codes are important because there is high demand to be the first media outlet to publish a story, which in turn affects the quality of journalism and the ethics of some. Source protection rules should also be re-evaluated, many people do not want If journalists can provide information on a particular topic, fearing that their name will be leaked, stricter and more "set in stone" rules in source protection would increase the trust that the public places in journalists. In doing so, people are more likely to come forward with information, which in some cases helps the police, provided journalists become more reliable in their sources. Trust in journalists also has an important impact on policy and public attitudes. to stay engaged in what is happening in their country. It is therefore important that journalists work to regain trust in all media outlets, otherwise those who decide to disengage may choose not to vote/learn about politics, which not only affects journalists but also the way the world works. politics,Left, right and political debate are areas in which trust between journalists and the public can decrease, depending on which party they lean towards. In this case, for example, The Guardian is Labor, moving towards the centre-left. That being said, this means that those on the right will not trust what is written. Solving this problem would mean remaining neutral in politics, providing facts but without showing bias. This can be difficult for media outlets, depending on their ownership and who they are funded by. Is local journalism in crisis? In short, yes, local journalism is in crisis, especially in recent decades. Local journalism is journalism that covers events in a local area that would not affect the rest of the world, for example the opening of a new store in a small town or a festival taking place in that particular area. Some examples of local journalism are Bournemouth Echo and Devon Live. These two media outlets publish and cover events that more or less only affect these areas. For example, the Bournemouth Echo published "Large queues form at Bournemouth's Build-A-Bear for unique offer" on July 12, 2018. An article like this clearly doesn't do it. affect many people outside Bournemouth. As these stories do not reach many people, local journalism is in crisis. Local journalism is needed to keep 'locals' informed about what's happening, for example Devon Live publishes daily information on road closures, weather warnings and much more. So overall, local news outlets remain very important, especially in places where newspapers are their only means of getting information. Local journalism often features many more "human interest" stories that are more relevant to individuals in a particular region. Local journalism has many benefits and challenges that put some local media outlets at risk. One of the main advantages of local journalism is that it captivates a more localized angle, which is one of the main reasons why local journalism is still viable. This is because people in the local area are more likely to read these media outlets because the events covered affect them personally. Local newspapers and other news outlets are most likely removing all international articles and therefore these are more likely to read them because they don't need to skim through articles that don't bother them as much. That being said, local journalism is facing many more challenges, making it increasingly difficult for it to stay afloat. One of the reasons fewer people read local news is that it's not about the "juicy" stuff, or major crimes, major events or political debates, but rather small town stories that don't interest many. Certain crimes are highlighted. in local newspapers, but only if they occur in the local circle in which that newspaper writes, otherwise it is daily information about upcoming events, jobs, store openings/closings and business stories. human interest. A challenge that has a big impact on localized journalism is funding. News outlets like the BBC, Sky and the Times receive much more funding because they have a larger circulation and therefore receive much more funding, from charities, lotteries and public funding. (Including people who watch, read and buy what the media outlet creates.) However; for local newspapers it is much more difficult to obtain.