Table of ContentsA Civil ModelAnalysis of the FilmConclusionA Civil ModelThe word civil carries a lot of weight. Usage should be carefully considered when entering a sentence or phrase. Civil means a wide variety of things. It can be defined as a way of being attentive to the forms necessary for good breeding. It can also be a way to meet the needs and business of the general public. However, the latter of the two definitions can also be expanded to include a definition of private rights and remedies sought by an action or suit. The fact is that the word civil has a broader meaning that has been adopted by our American legal culture. The principle is that the law is there to serve the people and that lawyers are mere guardians of the law. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get the original essay Film Analysis These are thoughts that were taken into account during the class viewing of A Civil Action. During the trial, many concerns were raised about our legal culture. For example, was the quest for money so great that it obscured the objectives of the affair? If the testimony was so technical, was it fair for the judge to interrupt the trial at the point he did, with the questions he wrote? This doesn't even include the degrees of separation that exist from true history. Is what was described by the speakers and the film an accurate representation of the case? However, the more important question is whether the lead lawyer's actions were done for the public good or out of a lust for money. The film itself raises a lot of questions. One of the most intriguing questions is whether Jan Schlichtmann's motivation is money or duty? The point of view of the film is clear. Travolta's character begins with a very lucrative malpractice law firm. He continues to provide the court and his adversaries with these little tricks that allow him to bring in money. However, is it always possible to maintain such a level of superficiality? Early in the film, Schlichtmann tells Anne Anderson that money from the corporations' deep pockets will be the excuses they seek. He doesn't care about their feelings and continues on his way trying to get the big sum of money. It was when he told her that money would be all the forgiveness she would need that a great injustice was done not only to Anne Anderson, but also to legal culture. It was at this point that Schlichtmann was no longer the guardian of the law. First of all, a civil action is an action for the public good. Tax compensation for those who suffered is not a public good. However, if you can ensure that such violations never happen again, that is a public good. This would be a civil action aimed at assisting the general public and ensuring their rights under the law and providing a healthy environment. Additionally, Jan should have taken the opportunity during meetings with Anne Anderson to explain to her how money would have been the apology. she was looking. To begin, we had to explain to her what type of apology she was going to receive. Jan should have made it clear that there would be no verbal communication of apologies from WR Grace and Beatrice. If there was an apology, both companies would openly admit they were at fault and invite thousands more lawsuits. Furthermore, it was Jan's duty as a lawyer to make his clients understand that an apology in the form of money is sufficient and effective. THE.?