blog




  • Essay / Understanding everyday life and repetition

    The impermanence of daily life is complex. It repeats itself over and over again in this linear movement of life with a variety of constants and variables. What is “everyday”? Why is it important to understand it? The term may be combined with other terms such as "routine" or "house". A space that provides a sort of foundation and constitutes a system in its own right. The word “anchor” can be misleading, although the “everyday” serves as a grid for our lives, it exists in a state of constant flux. He moves, balances, jumps, runs and sleeps. And all this happens and happens again. It leaves traces of its previous events, sometimes we are condemned to it or we evolve from it. But we can say that it is largely under the control of the repetition factor. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an original essay These recurrences are a way of understanding ourselves as individuals. A child responds to his name after repeating it over and over again until he finally identifies himself in response to the name. Therefore, it can be a way of making sense of the world to arrive at a level of coherence and derive an understanding of oneself and the world. Rita Felski, in “The Invention of Everyday Life,” states that repetition is essentially seen as a force contrary to progression. As we move forward, this regularity provides a feeling of reassurance. We're kind of equipped with a set of tools that help us move forward in the foreword. “Eating”, for example, does not need to be taught to us, we are doomed to a certain story that we repeat. You or I never invented this activity, other cyclical forces of nature drive it. But every time we perform an activity, we reinvent it. Duality Daily life coexists with the other specialized category of life. Otherwise it would cease to exist. The everyday system exists with its double side, which gives life to the mundane everyday life. Understanding the mundane is subjective in relation to its nature of existence. Besides immediate ideas like washing or eating, it also exists in other worlds, and these worlds differ from one individual to another. In the age of modern technology; Smartphones and social media play an important role in understanding the layers of meaning generated by the “everyday”, concerning individual experience but also the mass. The Daily exists in a larger arrangement accompanied by its dual world of production and capitalism. Michel de Certeau speaks of the colonization of everyday life by the commercial form. Production would not exist without consumption and conversely each brings to the other the very essence which would define them. A man needs the essentials to prepare food, but these can only be obtained if they have been produced. Preparing food is part of one's daily activity and making essential products available may be part of everyday life for others. It therefore builds a system that coexists. This is common ground shared by all members of society. It is one of the fundamentals that produces and reproduces it in order to support and nourish the growth of each other. According to Henri Lefebvre, it was in daily life that he saw capitalism surviving and reproducing. Members of everyday society, and therefore of capitalist society, reproduce activities from their routine by eliminating the material conditions from which the activity initially germinated. They are themselves responsible for this condition and fail to understand its roots. These activities maintain a veil that preventspeople to see that their own activities are responsible for this loop created in their daily lives. The Everyday System The everyday is the larger system that has functions that connect the dots and bring the systems together within it. There are subsystems created within the larger system, they depend on each other for functionality and growth. They may appear distant but connected by everyday life. As the everyday and the “specialized category” feed off each other, the system as a whole has an interdependent quality. For example, as mentioned in the text Quotidien et daily by Henri Lefebvre and Cristina Levich, Industrially produced foods operate around specific households. household appliances such as the refrigerator or oven. Once the dominant forces which allow these elements to combine with each other are understood, the mechanism is recognized and it cannot function without the support of the other. This is where the system breaks down. As a larger system of domination, what would happen if the World Wide Web collapsed? Subsystems that depend on this network support automatically become dysfunctional. Even though these functions may seem distant, they constitute a system of close links that allow it to function as a whole. It is therefore the most universal condition, the most singular and the most social, the most individuated, the most obvious and the best hidden. Besides the functional, it has non-functional aspects. This can probably be added to the “best hidden” category. I see the same fruit seller every day when I leave my house every morning, but one day I didn't see him. This cut short a coherent pattern in my mind. We all have those moments when we find ourselves wondering why? This does not disrupt any obvious functions of the day. I was still able to leave the house and continue my day like I always had. This image created in my mind probably has a subconscious function that may not seem practical in the everyday world. But I fed on it daily on a minor level. This added disruption, however subtle, ultimately resulted in this unknown sum. There are points of stagnation and flux in everyday life. There is an inconsistency in how this happens. But it shows up again and again, and it assures you of the event/activity/feeling. Modernity and everyday life constitute a deep structure that was built some time ago. New stories, trends and fashions have become part of everyday life. They all aim for “change”, how to “change life”, they want everything, and quickly and instantly. In the modern era, we have access to everything at our fingertips that allows us to travel far and fast. And this instant delivery increasingly makes us want to become mere passive consumers, neglecting value, meaning and the various factors that make us who we are. We are condemned to a certain story that we repeat at all times of the day. The repetition factor possesses us permanently. But this kind of possession is what makes us free since no one can claim anything. The postmodernist notion of "the original" rejects the modern idea that it is new and replaces it with the idea that it is an amalgam of elements from the past and pre-existing cultures. It emerges from a terrain of repetition and reappearances. This terrain is the grid. Rosalind Krauss emphasizes that “the grid” is paradoxically in the process of being rediscovered. According to her, it is another paradox than a prison in which the artist feels liberated. There was thereforebefore in other forms or in other cultures, and no one could claim to have invented it. And now, when we look at the works of artists like Agnès Martin or Mondrian, we can say that the works practically stop developing and engage in repetition. “The islands”, by Agnès Martin (fig. 1), are a group of twelve identical. Large Square Paintings is a body of work that provides an overview of the visual modalities in his work. The matte white color and the horizontal lines drawn in pencil remain constant in all the paintings. The work is reproduced within itself, which focuses an idea on the grid. According to her, these works are not ideal for reproduction because they are light and bright and therefore deal with fusion and formlessness. They are products of themselves but also do not exist as individual units. They are whole bodies which seek in some way to question the relationships between them. They do not exist one after the other, the body of work is a system and the individual paintings are functions within a larger system that creates the whole. Image of everyday life and the digital age In today's world, everyday life is constantly documented on our smartphones. Developed images distort our understanding of what we see, or rather disconnect us from reality. What is real and how it can be changed creates a divide at first. Then as we move forward, the “transformed” object gradually takes over our perception of our understanding of everyday life, due to the constant production of these images. This creates a culture that we are condemned to. Through social media platforms, we access the images of others that are reflected in our own and vice versa. Images become obsolete as new images are produced every day. Advertisements or any other media such as Instagram; they have become an extension of us. Marshall McLuhan talks about this extension. He says it's almost impossible to answer questions about man's extensions without considering them all together. Any extension, whether skin, hand or foot, affects the entire psyche and social complex. “In the electric age, where our central nervous system is technologically expanding to evolve us into all of humanity and incorporate all of humanity into us. We participate deeply in each of our actions. It is no longer possible to adopt the dissociated role of the literate consumer. “The logic behind the “filters” or “effects” provided by our smartphone apps is a way of grouping masses into categories rather than the image itself. These repeatedly produced images become an extension of ourselves and ultimately expand into a broader category that blurs the lines between distinct personalities or identities. “Young people who are avid users of social media apps such as Snapchat and Instagram are increasingly looking to actually look like what they look like after applying filters. This is why plastic surgeons are seeing an increasing number of visits from young people. At least 55 percent of plastic surgeons in the United States have seen an increase in patients seeking to "look better in selfies," according to the American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. » (Fig. 2) To modify/reconstruct the body to repeat what is happening in society is to take a big step towards escaping from oneself and becoming part of an unconscious cult that represents popular culture. Creation of meaning in everyday lifeThe noise of everyday life automatically imposes monotony. This.