Never Let Me Go by Kazuo Ishiguro is a dystopian novel set in London, focusing on the lives of special humans called donors. These donors are actually human clones, raised in private schools until adulthood, when their vital organs can be used for transplants into normal humans with health problems. Not only is Ishiguro's novel dystopian, it is also strange, offering "the revelation of that which is private or hidden: that which should have remained secret but has been revealed" (Marks 341). The novel can be considered strange because "the bioethical concern about the prospect of human cloning is clearly linked to a fear of the strange, in the sense that the clone constitutes a crisis of the "proper" and the "natural" ; mixture of the familiar and the unfamiliar” (Marks 341). The strange nature of the novel is significant because it creates a feeling of discomfort in the reader; the emotional and moral implications of this discomfort force the reader out of their comfort zone. In Never Let Me Go, Ishiguro uses the genre of weirdness to subtly critique the modern class system and general ignorance of suffering. This is done by using a clone's point of view to tell the narrative, the humanization of the clones, and the societal implications of the clones' existence. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get the original essay Ishiguro's use of Kathy's point of view in Never Let Me Go allows readers to empathize with the clones. Readers discover the story fits with a greeting from older Kathy (Ishiguro 13), which references the story. Because Kathy is the central voice of the story, Ishiguro inherently places importance on the clone's point of view. This “[has] the merit of presenting cloned life, even problematically, as an imagined and integrated social and psychological experience” (Marks 333). Because readers are confronted with the reality of cloned life, they are forced to consider the depth of the implications of social class and also apply those implications to their own, real-world lives. Additionally, Ishiguro asks Kathy to tell the story “[relying] on autobiographical concepts, that is, on the memory of education. However... [it is] an autobiography emptied of its usual depth and recognition of a fuller life outside the text. limits… set rather on the little experience that the protagonist possesses” (Mcdonald 78). Not only is the story from a clone's point of view, but it chronicles the life of a clone within a clone society. In fact, the scope of the story is generally limited to clone culture. Kathy discusses the social and romantic aspects of her life, but spends little time discussing world events outside of her private school, Hailsham. His naivety about the world contrasts sharply with the harshness of his looming future: “You will become adults, then before you even reach middle age, you will start donating your vital organs. This is what each of you was created to be. do" (Ishiguro 364). Even when confronted with this reality, his character avoids any discussion of tragedy or equality for most of the novel. This draws sympathy from the reader, who sees the injustice objectively and therefore reacts with a Appropriate anger Overall, "Kathy just doesn't seem to recognize the full horror of what she's saying to the reader: '...It's in this sense that Kathy H's voice can seem strange, a. term that captures the unsettling mix of the familiar and the unfamiliar characteristic of automatons and non-human doubles, toto which Sigmund Freud first assigned the term “ ” (Marks 348). Kathy's apparent apathy toward her tragic future creates unease for the reader, who wonders why the main character breaks a binary logic and treats injustice with passivity. This disruption of the heroic protagonist archetype by an objectively sympathetic protagonist allows the reader to sympathize with the oppressed, but does not directly attack the reader's position. Essentially, Ishiguro uses a theoretical world to make his protagonist universally sympathetic, regardless of the reader's background, and thus have a reader sympathetic to Kathy's plight. Ishiguro further allows the reader to empathize with the clones by humanizing them as a group. . Kathy is kind and sensitive, as shown in her dealings with the bullied boy Tommy (Ishiguro 390-3). Thus, “the reader wonders why Kathy H. – a seemingly perceptive and sensitive person, who clearly has a recognizable inner life (a “soul”) – can accept her difference and her destiny with such serenity” (Marcs 348). ). Because the clones in the book exhibit traits characteristic of normal humans – sensitivity, creativity – their sense of otherness is diminished. The possibility of a soul means that clones are no different from humans; this transforms the act of donation into systematic genocide. Kindness is not the only proof of soul: "the students of Hailsham cultivate the hope of being able to find their 'possibles', that is to say the individuals from whom they were initially cloned... We too , we are copycats, and their vain search for “possibilities” constitutes a touching parallel to our own efforts to give narrative coherence to conventional biological kinship relationships” (Marks 349). they want to feel like legitimate beings in a world that tells them they are unnatural. Loyalty and a sense of family are a central motivator among biological beings. Because clones are largely isolated from the world. externally, this act of seeking relationships is not an imitation of normal humans It is an inherent component of their self-esteem However, society in the novel does not recognize this evidence. the children (or captives) are described as "special" and "gifted" by their guardians (or guardians), and their murders are described as "completions", a shocking reminder of their sole purpose in the eyes of society, and of the way in which language can normalize atrocities deemed necessary within a given ideology” (Mcdonald 78). The society in the novel uses language as a barrier between itself and its immoral activity. In the novel, "special" implies that the clones are subhuman and therefore lack essential human rights. They are different, therefore they are not equal. The term “completion” is a mechanical interpretation of death; this implies that clones are machines whose lives are not fulfilled or useful unless they sacrifice it for the sake of normal humans. Language, as an element of book culture, is used to manipulate public opinion and discredit the claims of those who suffer. Because the culture has been shaped to approve of this activity, members of this society are trained not to question the nature of this activity. The fact that the argument that clones are subhuman is not based on any behavioral evidence does not bother the society that profits from the lie. The society in the book is willing to live in dishonesty as long as it is comfortable. In order to make the fate of the clones more personal for the reader and therefore to.