Policy Analysis: Suffering Unborn Child Protection Act unborn child capable of suffering. This legislation aims to impose legal consequences on anyone who attempts an abortion if the likely age of the fetus is 20 weeks or more. This document goes into explicit detail about this legislation, including: the objectives and values of the bill, the effects it has on society and individuals, related versions of this bill, which supports and supports opposes this bill, and final thoughts and opinions on this bill. Say no to plagiarism. Get a custom essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”?Get the original essayLegislationThe proposed legislation that will be analyzed is HR 36 – 115th Congress: The Suffering-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act. This bill was proposed at the federal level, where it was considered in the House and passed. However, in the Senate, the bill was read twice and then referred to the Judiciary Committee. The purpose or intended purpose of this legislation was to have legal consequences for anyone who attempted an abortion if the likely age of the fetus was 20 weeks or more. This legislation specifically targeted doctors, Planned Parenthood and OBGYNs who perform abortions. Women who undergo abortion will not be criminalized. The legal consequences of this action for any employee would be: a fine, five years in prison, or both. However, there are some exceptions to this legislation, which are: when the abortion is necessary due to the life of the pregnant woman or if the woman was pregnant because of rape or incest. This legislation also states that if abortion is necessary, then a doctor must follow certain requirements during the procedure. The purpose of this legislation was to ban abortions after 20 weeks due to the pain they would inflict on the fetus. No values are clearly stated in this proposition, but many values are implied. The values involved are the protection of the unborn child and support for life. This proposal is based more on a republican point of view and on a Christian context. This legislation could also have financial consequences if passed. The Cbo. The government (2018) estimates that the cost of Medicaid would increase due to an increase in birth rates. The CBO assumes that abortions would occur before 20 weeks and that full-term pregnancies would increase. However, Medicaid is estimated to increase by $175 million over the 2018-2027 period. If this legislation were passed, it is likely that state and federal taxes would be increased. The people who would be responsible for paying for this increase would be the taxpayers. The sponsor of this bill is Representative Trent Franks. He served in Congress from 2003 to 2017. He is affiliated with the Republican Party. The last action taken on this bill was taken by the Senate on 04/10/2017. The bill was received in the Senate and read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. This bill passed the House. The bill was debated in the Senate and they decided not to move forward. Effects This bill could affect any woman who has conceived and is considering an abortion. Some people feel that this legislation would take away women's rights over their bodies. They think women should be able to make their own decisionsregarding their body. Regardless, if this legislation were implemented, it could affect many women. Statistically, abortion patients differ by age, race, and income in the United States. Most patients who have abortions in the United States occur before their 20s. Race is also another factor that could be considered when debating who this legislation will affect most. Statistically, the rate of abortion patients was as follows: white (39%), black (28%), Hispanic (25%), Asian (6%), and other races/ethnicities (3%). Finally, income influences statistics on abortion patients. Statistically, poverty had a significant impact on abortion patients. People living below the poverty line represent 49% of people who have abortions, while 29% of patients still live just on the edge of the poverty line. Gender is obviously not affected by this legislation as men are not able to conceive. Social conditions Many social conditions surround this proposition. Abortion has always been a huge social justice issue within our country and a very controversial topic. This proposal, however, indicated that new evidence had been discovered that a fetus can experience pain 20 weeks or more after fertilization. Emerging evidence also indicates that surgeons who perform these procedures anesthetize the unborn child. Anesthesia is used to prevent harsh or severe movements during surgery. This concludes that the unborn child may experience pain for 20 weeks (or more after fertilization). This legislation was being considered due to many people's concerns about the unborn child. Individuals who are in favor want to defend the unborn, while those who are not in favor want to defend women's rights and their own choices regarding their bodies. The push for this legislation was due to the 20 states that had already banned abortion with their own specific version. During this time, Republicans controlled Congress, giving supporters of this legislation hope that the bill would pass. Finally, this bill was introduced around the time 10 Planned Parenthood videos were released. These videos included exposure of Planned Parenthood selling body parts of babies they aborted. This was a major event that concerned many people and was a time when many felt the need to stand up for the unborn. Historical Connections This bill has historical connections and antecedents within government. This bill has been considered by the House twice and passed before. Previous versions were introduced as the 2013 and 2015 versions. The 2013 version was known as HR 1797 (113th): Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act and the 2015 version was known as HR 36 (114th). ):Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protect Act.SupportThe sponsor of this bill is Representative Trent Franks. He served in Congress from 2003 to 2017. He is affiliated with the Republican Party. Trent Franks is a staunch advocate for the cause of unborn children. Trent Franks Quotes; “Late-term abortion in America has its defenders, but no real or principled defense. The Protection of Unborn Children Capable of Suffering Act aims to provide basic protection to mothers and their unborn children who enter the sixth month of gestation.” He is passionate about protecting not only the unborn child, but also the mother. Another key player who supported this proposal was Kevin McCarthy, a leader..

Essay / Policy Analysis: Suffering Unborn Child Protection Act unborn child capable of suffering. This legislation aims to impose legal consequences on anyone who attempts an abortion if the likely age of the fetus is 20 weeks or more. This document goes into explicit detail about this legislation, including: the objectives and values of the bill, the effects it has on society and individuals, related versions of this bill, which supports and supports opposes this bill, and final thoughts and opinions on this bill. Say no to plagiarism. Get a custom essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”?Get the original essayLegislationThe proposed legislation that will be analyzed is HR 36 – 115th Congress: The Suffering-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act. This bill was proposed at the federal level, where it was considered in the House and passed. However, in the Senate, the bill was read twice and then referred to the Judiciary Committee. The purpose or intended purpose of this legislation was to have legal consequences for anyone who attempted an abortion if the likely age of the fetus was 20 weeks or more. This legislation specifically targeted doctors, Planned Parenthood and OBGYNs who perform abortions. Women who undergo abortion will not be criminalized. The legal consequences of this action for any employee would be: a fine, five years in prison, or both. However, there are some exceptions to this legislation, which are: when the abortion is necessary due to the life of the pregnant woman or if the woman was pregnant because of rape or incest. This legislation also states that if abortion is necessary, then a doctor must follow certain requirements during the procedure. The purpose of this legislation was to ban abortions after 20 weeks due to the pain they would inflict on the fetus. No values are clearly stated in this proposition, but many values are implied. The values involved are the protection of the unborn child and support for life. This proposal is based more on a republican point of view and on a Christian context. This legislation could also have financial consequences if passed. The Cbo. The government (2018) estimates that the cost of Medicaid would increase due to an increase in birth rates. The CBO assumes that abortions would occur before 20 weeks and that full-term pregnancies would increase. However, Medicaid is estimated to increase by $175 million over the 2018-2027 period. If this legislation were passed, it is likely that state and federal taxes would be increased. The people who would be responsible for paying for this increase would be the taxpayers. The sponsor of this bill is Representative Trent Franks. He served in Congress from 2003 to 2017. He is affiliated with the Republican Party. The last action taken on this bill was taken by the Senate on 04/10/2017. The bill was received in the Senate and read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. This bill passed the House. The bill was debated in the Senate and they decided not to move forward. Effects This bill could affect any woman who has conceived and is considering an abortion. Some people feel that this legislation would take away women's rights over their bodies. They think women should be able to make their own decisionsregarding their body. Regardless, if this legislation were implemented, it could affect many women. Statistically, abortion patients differ by age, race, and income in the United States. Most patients who have abortions in the United States occur before their 20s. Race is also another factor that could be considered when debating who this legislation will affect most. Statistically, the rate of abortion patients was as follows: white (39%), black (28%), Hispanic (25%), Asian (6%), and other races/ethnicities (3%). Finally, income influences statistics on abortion patients. Statistically, poverty had a significant impact on abortion patients. People living below the poverty line represent 49% of people who have abortions, while 29% of patients still live just on the edge of the poverty line. Gender is obviously not affected by this legislation as men are not able to conceive. Social conditions Many social conditions surround this proposition. Abortion has always been a huge social justice issue within our country and a very controversial topic. This proposal, however, indicated that new evidence had been discovered that a fetus can experience pain 20 weeks or more after fertilization. Emerging evidence also indicates that surgeons who perform these procedures anesthetize the unborn child. Anesthesia is used to prevent harsh or severe movements during surgery. This concludes that the unborn child may experience pain for 20 weeks (or more after fertilization). This legislation was being considered due to many people's concerns about the unborn child. Individuals who are in favor want to defend the unborn, while those who are not in favor want to defend women's rights and their own choices regarding their bodies. The push for this legislation was due to the 20 states that had already banned abortion with their own specific version. During this time, Republicans controlled Congress, giving supporters of this legislation hope that the bill would pass. Finally, this bill was introduced around the time 10 Planned Parenthood videos were released. These videos included exposure of Planned Parenthood selling body parts of babies they aborted. This was a major event that concerned many people and was a time when many felt the need to stand up for the unborn. Historical Connections This bill has historical connections and antecedents within government. This bill has been considered by the House twice and passed before. Previous versions were introduced as the 2013 and 2015 versions. The 2013 version was known as HR 1797 (113th): Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act and the 2015 version was known as HR 36 (114th). ):Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protect Act.SupportThe sponsor of this bill is Representative Trent Franks. He served in Congress from 2003 to 2017. He is affiliated with the Republican Party. Trent Franks is a staunch advocate for the cause of unborn children. Trent Franks Quotes; “Late-term abortion in America has its defenders, but no real or principled defense. The Protection of Unborn Children Capable of Suffering Act aims to provide basic protection to mothers and their unborn children who enter the sixth month of gestation.” He is passionate about protecting not only the unborn child, but also the mother. Another key player who supported this proposal was Kevin McCarthy, a leader..

Navigation

« Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next »

Get In Touch