just war theory “A way of morally justifying war by the theory according to which, despite its evils, war can be necessary and justifiable in certain conditions and within certain limits. The conditions for entering and waging wars are built. This differs from pacifism and holy war theory. Traditional just war theory covers three main topics: the cause of war, the conduct of war, and the consequences of war. Or, in the Scholastic tags: jus ad bellum, jus in bello and jus post bellum. But the greatest attention is now paid to the medium term, to the conduct of the war. This is where clear infractions are most easily identified, even if they are only occasionally reported and even more rarely punished. The two main rules of jus in bello concern discrimination between combatants and non-combatants, the latter having to be spared as much as possible, and proportionality, so that violence is calibrated according to its necessity to achieve the end of the war . The moral claims here are difficult to recognize in actual combat, and contested when they are recognized. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get the original essay Just war theory determines the conditions for judging whether it is just fighting, as well as the conditions for how war should be fought. Although it was largely created by Christian scholars, it tends to be used by individuals of all faiths and none. The simple theory of war is to a large extent a Christian way of thinking that strives to take into account three things: taking human life is not just, states have an obligation to defend their residents and ensure to fairness by guaranteeing innocent human life and safeguarding important virtues and expectations. ability to use power and brutality. The goal of just war theory is to provide states with the correct path to take when acting in circumstances of potential conflict. This only applies to states, not people (although an individual can use the assumption to allow them to choose whether it is ethically appropriate to participate in a specific war. Just war principles have been governed to prevent wars and their disastrous consequences. For example, a just war can only be fought as a last resort. All non-violent options must be exhausted before the use of force can be justified. just if it is fought with a reasonable chance of success and the injuries suffered for a hopeless cause are not morally justifiable. The ultimate goal of a just war is to restore peace. More precisely, the peace established after the war. must be preferable to the peace that would have prevailed if war had not occurred. Violence used in war must be proportional to the injuries suffered. States are prohibited from using force if it is not necessary to do so. achieve the limited objective of remedying the injuries suffered. Civilians are never permissible targets of war, and every effort should be made to avoid killing civilians. The death of civilians is only justified if they are the inevitable victims of a deliberate attack on a military target. A war is only just if it is waged by a legitimate authority. Even just causes cannot be served by actions undertaken by individuals or groups who do not constitute an authority sanctioned by all that the.