In 2016, Bob Dylan won the Nobel Prize for Literature. Bob Dylan is a lyricist and this honor lies in the recognition of his commitment to writing through his compositions. Dylan's success is a topic of discussion because – other Nobel Prize winners in literature are fictional essayists, artists and true-to-life authors – he is named a songwriter. Some will take issue with his work, while others will feel that he fits the bill as a unique Nobel Prize winner essentially because he is Bob Dylan. Which condition is correct anyway? Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an Original Essay The main question that needs to be answered is: Are songs “literature?” » “Literature” is a term that changes and has changed, and the variation used is not quite the same as the conventional definition. A definition that is perfectly suited to tunes and composed works. Thus, Bob Dylan's works are indeed eligible for the Nobel Prize. Some might say that music is more of a base subject than fiction essayists, which may be true; The primary focus should not be on form, but on execution. One of the melodies he composed was "Blowin' in the Wind." This melody was written in 1962, when the Vietnam War had not yet begun, but was used, two or three years later, as a tune of dissent against the war. “Blowin' in the Wind” begins: “How many roads must a man travel before you call him a man?” Yes, and how many seas must a white dove travel before sleeping in the sand? He asks a few main questions so he can ask the last question, the one about the war. The final question is an inquiry that attacks the legislature and the appropriate response remains the same. With this song, Bob Dylan needs the administration to understand that they are acting crazy. Through facetious inquiries, he attempts to convey his message, his appeal for opportunity, to the president and his supporters. It covers all human conduct. He executed this message effectively because it was topical, it was ministerial and it wasn't what you usually got on the radio, which at the time was overwhelmed by deeply created pop melodies. An expression constantly comes up when we try to find out how the Nobel committees decide: the best benefit for humanity. There are different ways to decipher this. The first is to affirm that this work of the highest caliber truly changed the lives of those who were contacted. The other is to argue that the work had the greatest effect on the vast majority. Of all the potential candidates, Bob Dylan has certainly had the greatest global impact. “If poverty were to be sold for three cents today, I cannot buy it.” One could say that Ngugi wa Thiong'o is a writer of greater quality (which is true), but this is not as strong a quantitative argument for him. The point is, if we look at it both ways, with the “greater advantage” being quantitative OR qualitative, Dylan wins either way because he has both. What can be said is that Ngugi wa Thiong'o's work is the work of a Gikuyu poet and therefore constitutes an important voice in the context of current events; but there's no denying that he touched the same number of people as Dylan. The fact is that if we look at it two different ways, with the "more notable advantage" being quantitative OR subjective, Dylan wins either way since he has the 2016.