John Naisbitt's quote: "We are drowning in information but we are starving for knowledge" seems to refer to the question of the quality of knowledge, as some knowledge claims tend to lack quality. What the quote purports to mean, how one can separate the quality of information from the quantity of information provided and thus accept it, is entirely relevant to the title. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an original essay The given title expresses that whether more or fewer people accept a certain piece of knowledge is the most effective way to measure its quality. a particular knowledge. Measuring the quality of knowledge by the number of people who accept it is a statement I would stand by, but sometimes it is not the best way to measure the quality of knowledge produced. The main focus of the essay, which is knowledge, has many definitions in general. The philosopher Plato defined knowledge as “true and justified belief,” which is a plausible definition for both philosophers and individuals. This is directly related to the quality of knowledge, where quality can be defined as: the standard of something or an attribute compared to something of the same kind. I will first discuss how to measure the quality of knowledge, then I will continue by discussing whether the number of people accepting a knowledge claim would indicate the quality of the knowledge claim. It is therefore more important to address the following knowledge question to justify the arguments: "How can we measure the quality of knowledge?" Rather, it is important to know what steps to take to know whether a piece of knowledge is high or low quality before accepting it. There are many ways to measure the quality of knowledge, but it is necessary to look at the claim, accessibility and verifiability of knowledge being what determines the quality of knowledge. For example, in biology, oxygen is thought to be produced by green plants when they absorb the carbon dioxide we release. This knowledge is accepted by a large number of individuals because it is “accessible”. This knowledge is available in books and on the Internet, which are two of the main sources of knowledge. An individual can therefore accept it through deductive reasoning because there are many sources available to the individual. Recently, I conducted an experiment for my internal ESS assessment that measured the number of oxygen bubbles produced by the Elodea plant per minute with different water pH levels. Through this experiment I was able to “verify” that green plants produce oxygen even in water through sensory perception (sight) as well as compare the results with existing knowledge on the same type of experiment . So, if the knowledge is accessible and verifiable, it is of high quality. In contrast, knowledge reliability proves that the knowledge is of high quality. The book 1984 by George Orwell seems to be a very relevant example to support this counterclaim as a work of art. In 1984, Orwell described a totalitarian country neglected by Big Brother and "his party". The protagonist, Winston Smith, is one of the few who opposes the spewing party and has a different ideology than the party. Winston is described as working in the archives department of the Ministry of Truth, and his workinvolves rewriting historical articles and newspapers to match what the mercurial party is saying in the present. The things that provide/inform us with accessible knowledge do not seem as reliable as we assume, this question is also relevant in today's world with all the mass media at our disposal. There are many incidents in the book that speak to this topic, particularly in Chapter 7, where Winston discusses a children's book from the past, various claims given by the party and the three individuals. “Everything vanished into the fog. The past has been erased, the erasure has been forgotten, the lie has become truth” is a quote to remember because that’s what the party was doing. The most significant incident occurs when Winston recalls an encounter with three men, Jones, Aaronson and Rutherford, who had confessed to old and new crimes and were allegedly executed in 1968. According to Winston's memory , after 5 years, in 1973, Winston had discovered a photo of a reception in which men were present and named. Thus, concluded “the confessions were lies”. It can be concluded that the reliability of knowledge plays an important role in determining its quality through various ways of knowing, such as memory, which brings me to the KQ answer. There are many ways to measure the quality of knowledge, including how many people accept it. but one must also consider its availability, verifiability and reliability since these are the factors that determine the quality of knowledge and therefore measure the quality of knowledge by the number of people who accept it. This raises another question of knowledge; To what extent would people's acceptance of knowledge claims indicate their quality? Since quality can be measured in different ways (but there are a few that should be used), people's acceptance of knowledge claims also impacts knowledge quality. knowledge. In some cases, the quality of knowledge is indicated by the number of people who accept it. Art can be defined as an expression of human creative skill in order to produce a given work, and music is therefore a form of art. American rapper J. Cole recently released an album titled KOD which addresses drug addiction, racism, and other social issues that have affected or are impacting Cole and the millennials that Cole targets. The album is an acronym for the following: Kids On Drugs, King Over Dosed and Kill Our Demons, which are the social and personal issues that inspired Cole's work; the first refers to the popularity of drug use among today's younger generation, the second refers to J. Cole himself and his experience with drugs and finally the third, which means l society's ultimate goal of facing its fears. These are the few reasons why Cole's work is high quality. Since Cole doesn't have a huge fan base compared to other artists like Drake, his album broke several records and was nominated for album of the year. ' rewards. Cole shares what he has observed and felt throughout his life and uses emotion, reasoning, language, memory and sensory perception in order to create his works of art that appeal to his audience and are thus able to convey his messages to them. Because his work refers to many social and personal issues, many people are able to identify with his message and understand his expressions, thus giving credibility to his work and thus defining its quality. It is.