Nowadays, the world and the societies we live in are governed by a set of rules set by governments. Politics is the power that controls and maintains human behavior. Thus, the implementation of certain technologies within society may be neutral, and in some cases they may have certain intentions, uses and policies. In this brief essay, we will discuss how weapons; the result of human engineering contains politics itself. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get the original essay Thousands of years ago, humans hunted to eat and survive. Materials such as wooden arrows and bows were used. However, times have changed and the “use” of these materials has changed as well. We went from survival kit to self-defense. Wooden materials became bronze and metal weapons. Weapons are now used by police officers, but also by criminals. “Self-defense” equipment has been improved and now, in 2018, several countries possess weapons of mass destruction. The main point here is that as technology emerged throughout history, weapons evolved with it. In the previous paragraph, we briefly touched on the history of weapons while emphasizing that technology was the reason for this evolution. Thus, the social determination of technology and technology policy theory come into play. By definition, the social determination of technology is the idea that society determines its design and implementation while being neutral when it is integrated into a social and economic system. On the other hand, the theory that technologies are designed with certain intentions, uses and policies is the theory of technology policy. Weapons can be seen as a mixture of these two theories. When weapons were first used and invented, there was no intention to include political ideas as they were used for survival purposes. However, political ideas developed on their own over time. Weapons became something much more complex when they were introduced into society. Criminals use them to steal, to kill and police officers use them to defend themselves. In Lawrence Lessig's article, "Code is law," he talks about freedom in cyberspace and how governments can contain and control this "freedom." In Canada, weapons are prohibited, only law enforcement and the military can use them. However, in the United States, guns are legal and people can buy them. The crime rate is very high, but the government doesn't seem to care enough about it. For what? The arms sales business brings in billions of dollars. Being a nuclear weapon state makes your country strong and powerful, capable of controlling the world because everyone fears you. Furthermore, wars around the world occur for one simple reason: to sell weapons. Political parties claim that weapons facilities do not belong to the state but to the private sector. So why is the government legalizing guns if it doesn't make them any money? Finally, democracy, equality and freedom are the main American political values. Liberty and equality by allowing people to own materials that can kill others. Keep in mind: this is just a sample. Get a personalized article from our expert writers now...