Table of ContentsBureaucracy as a Possible Approach to ManagementMain Points, Advantages and Disadvantages of Scientific Management TheoryConclusionReferencesThis analysis report will cover the following on this what exactly does bureaucratic and administrative management mean, and specific management scientific management style. We will begin this essay with the definitions of the main terms and their purposes below. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why violent video games should not be banned”?Get the original essayBureaucracy as a possible approach to managementBureaucracy is a legal approach to management where the rules established within a company are simpler, without emotion/feelings. Organization and structure are the two main elements creating a hierarchy that clearly defines these rules. This ensures that management achieves organizational objectives to create the “ideal” organization/business. The objective of bureaucratic management is to achieve recruitment based on qualifications, promotion based on merit, chain of command, division of labor, impartial application of rules and procedures recorded in writing and finally separation managers of the owners. Max Weber is the man from Bureaucracy who was a German political economist and sociologist, which is a modern example of organization theory. Rational rules of legal decision-making and organizational hierarchy have both shaped the public and private sectors and how they view the term bureaucratic management. A public sector example would be “Environmental Protection Agency” and a private sector example would be “IBM”. The second term of this analysis question is administrative management. This style of management focuses on the principles of management: plan, organize, coordinate, command and control. In total, there are 14 management principles. The five mentioned above are the most important in terms of administrative management. It helps manage information across people. This is a more formalized approach to management by forming a clear division of labor between employees, delegating authority and power to those higher in the hierarchy of areas of responsibility. In this analysis, I will examine scientific management formed by Frederick W. Taylor, Lillion and Frank Gilbreth, and Henry Gantt. The main ideas of this theory are to identify the best and most efficient way to accomplish a job/task by studying and testing different ways of working. Improving economic efficiency and especially labor productivity.Main points, advantages and disadvantages of scientific management theoryBriefly explaining the main ideas of scientific management is done step by step. The first is to find the best way to complete each piece of work by studying it and finding a solution. The second is to scientifically select, train and develop employees to help them reach their full potential in the task assigned to them. Third, you must cooperate with employees to ensure that they follow the guidelines that you have both agreed upon. Fourth, there is a need to ensure equality among employees and ensure that there is an equal division of labor between managers and employees within the company. Finally, it is about compensating the salary through a fair analysis of the employees' working day. These steps help shape the management style of scientific management. Managementscience has many advantages and disadvantages. The main points of the theory that I admire are how it can train the minds of employees to achieve better results in producing work. This is done through specialization of the division of labor so that employees are placed in areas of work that they are already familiar with and specialize in. This can improve the connection between employees and managers and revolutionize the mindset of both internal stakeholders. Reducing production costs could be an advantage IF employees manage to adapt well to changes and perform well in their positions. Two aspects that I think could go wrong with scientific management are that for small businesses it is very unsuitable because it would be too costly for the business to implement these rules and regulations. Another disadvantage would be that employees are not able to adapt to the new rules. If so, it elicits a weak response from workers. “The McDonaldization of Society” written by George Ritzer in 2000. Clearly specifies how scientific management is used in the contemporary world. For example, “McDonald’s” is a huge franchise that has thousands of stores around the world. Some management techniques outlined in the book included McDonalds ensuring "accurate cooking times for all products" and "temperature settings for all equipment." This was achieved through the subdivision of work; McDonalds divided employees into small groups so they could focus only on their part of the job. For example, cooks had to grill meat moving from left to right, with six rows of patties and six patties each. (Ritzer (2000) page 38). McDonald's is a perfect example of a successful business that has benefited scientific leadership. Every McDonald's uses the same techniques and rules, making it the largest restaurant chain in the world. McDonald's has changed the world of "fast food" and assured consumers that they will receive their order in a very short time and continually achieves this through highly trained staff. Frederick W. Taylor, Frank Gilbreth and Lillian all managed to change the way businesses operate and work with managers and employees. By setting tasks and objectives to achieve to ensure maximum quality production. Frederick W. Taylor was successful in developing scientific methods for doing work, giving rewards for achieving goals, establishing productivity goals, and training employees on how to use methods to achieve productivity and performance. overall objectives. The only factor that would prevent Frederick W. Taylor from fully realizing his theory of scientific management would be that setting a specific time, place, and structure would leave no opportunity for the employee to think clearly about what is assigned to him. In other words, the employee may feel overwhelmed or pressured to achieve the goals/tasks set by managers. Scientific management has benefited many aspects of a business. Scientific management can improve workplace cost reduction, higher quality products, division of labor, better working conditions and resource utilization. This will also benefit internal stakeholders such as owners and shareholders as increased production and productivity will lead to increased turnover, which translates into increased profits for investors. For employees, their work.