Table of ContentsArgument 1Argument 2Argument 3RebuttalShould We Keep Guns? I think we should keep guns to protect ourselves. If we didn't have guns how could we protect ourselves if someone broke into your house they would have a gun and what would you have? Nothing. So the point is, yes, we should keep them, because if we didn't have them, we become an easy target for others. Taking away guns won't stop people from committing suicide, not everyone uses a gun. You should always be armed because you never know what could happen. A knife wouldn't help you because you have to get close to them and you don't know what they are capable of. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get the original essayArgument 1: We need guns, there are so many stalkers and abusers who prey on women and men. Additionally, having gun control laws will not stop criminals from breaking the laws. In this quote it says: “The Second Amendment to the United States Constitution states: “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be violated. » what that basically means is that it's a free state and people have the right and that takes away the 2nd amendment. Argument 2 While many so-called experts claim that gun violence is at an all-time high, the fact is that on the contrary, since the 1990s, gun violence has been decreasing and, in fact, between 1993 and 2000 , the gun homicide rate fell by almost half, from 7.0 homicides to 3.8 homicides per 100,000 residents. Since then, the gun homicide rate has remained relatively stable. From 2009 to 2014, the most recent data available, the number of gun homicides fluctuated between 11,000 and 12,000 per year. In contrast, a significantly higher – and increasing – number of gun deaths are due to suicide than homicide, and this has been true over the past two decades. Take Chicago for example, they have the strictest gun laws in the country, but they have the highest gun violence of any other city in America and you may wonder why and the answer is simple, when you pass laws that prevent law-abiding citizens from owning a gun to protect themselves and their families, you put guns in the hands of criminals only because law-abiding citizens follow the laws and not criminals, that's is why we have guns in the first place, to protect ourselves from criminalsArgument 3On the issue of debating the second amendment, there really is no debate, the constitution is pretty clear. On a legal level, the debates often boil down to the Second Amendment, the context and language of which from the 18th century have been constantly analyzed and debated: "A well-regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of people to keep and bear arms will not be violated. » Gun rights advocates say it means an individual right to gun ownership, while gun control advocates say it means the collective right of the people, through 'a militia. However, the fact is that the Second Amendment never had anything to do with hunting because back when the Constitution was created. if you haven't hunted you haven't eaten and as far as a militia is concerned, we the people are the real militia and not the national guard. The National Guard responds to.