Popol Vuh versus Gilgamesh Although both texts Gilgamesh and Popol Vuh have many similarities, abject inscription, etc. I would expressly not call the two texts equal. In my opinion, for two texts to be equal, they must imitate an unfixed axis that goes to the whole news, and not a small glimmer that only reverses the measurement of the SMS. In other conversations, I expect that two texts can have identical events, but have completely different meanings. Popol Vuh and Gilgamesh certainly had more similarities than dissimilarities, but it is the consequence of these similarities, not the magnitude, that in the number of acts. The character of this insignificant madman who suddenly appears in both texts does not prevent the fact that these two texts have distinct meanings. In this article, I will disperse the similarities and dissimilarities of these two texts without any inclination towards the dissimilarities, letting the facts articulate themselves. The similarities between Popol Vuh and Gilgamesh are mild, to say the least. The first and most disturbing similarity in my firmness is the cultural dimension of the two texts. Each text can be used widely to think about its civilized motive. The Popol Vuh is, in return, a close kinship, or for lack of an improved language "register" for the original Mayan politeness, through thought we can learn more about their beliefs, which by metamorphosing, allow us to to help, to nourish their contribution. up. For example, the Popol Vuh claims that humans were made from pellets; From this we can understand that Mayan relationships resort to fodder as their higher dispositions increase. The Popol Vuh also expresses the precept that animals existed since, the first attempt of the gods to regenerate their husband, of this culture...... middle of paper ......ish when they first compose Mexico, then later by American historians, not recently this hundred. The deletion of these texts is incredibly worrying to bring "unity" to SMS, and that of the irrational variance in the translations of these texts their "personalities" is clear enough. In deduction, I would prefer to understand that although there are many similarities between these texts, most of them are either at the trivial, impartial and uniform level that they generally have, or in the way in which our association examines them like a period of aged illumination of the gaze. Works Cited: “Epic of Gilgamesh.” Encyclopedia Britannica. Encyclopedia Britannica Online Academic Edition. Encyclopedia Britannica Inc., 2013. Web. December 10, 2013. “Popol Vuh.” Encyclopedia Britannica. Encyclopedia Britannica Online Academic Edition. Encyclopedia Britannica Inc., 2013. Web. December 10. 2013