Analysis of Adam's Ethical Dilemma Jennifer Pierce works as an intern at Mega Drug. Mercury is a national retail pharmacy. There, Jennifer does regular things. One day, she is responsible for restocking a few shelves. During the restocking process, Jennifer notices that the company's own-brand medications outnumber the brand name medications. This is obviously a problem for patients. When Jennifer points this out to Tony, the manager, Tony's response and responses seem odd. He explains the situation by saying that there could be a shocking mistake. He also adds that they should encourage customers to try their own brand medicines rather than the branded ones. The reason is simple. Own-brand drugs can generate more profit. Even with some customers, if they trust their company's products and the company has enough success stories to prove the function of their products, employees like Jennifer and Tony have the right to promote their own products? Based on balanced supply, the manager may choose to consider his or her own salary or bonus before anything else. There is no ethical error here if the manager promotes his own products whose functionality has been proven, based on balanced storage. In conclusion, the manager's idea of ​​promoting own brand medicines while retaining the “stocking error” creates an ethical dilemma. For Jennifer, it is difficult to make a decision. To consider key stakeholders, different decisions may result in a different outcome. Some are good for the business. The others are good for customers. There is also a way to balance the situation. Therefore, choosing the balanced option seems to be the best way to resolve the dilemma. In my opinion, when facing this kind of ethical dilemma, the priority should always be the low growth of P. Compared with the physical condition of patients, the salaries of ordinary employees should be considered as IBGGGlue. However, if its own brand product has decent function and lower price. There is no