Have you ever heard the name Frank Abagnale Jr? He is known for his past as a former conman, check forger and impostor when he was between the ages of 15 and 21. He became one of the most notorious impostors, claiming to have assumed as many as eight identities, including an airline. pilot, a doctor, a U.S. Bureau of Prisons agent and a lawyer. Her true story was written as fiction co-written by Stan Redding and was adapted into a 2002 film of the same name by director Steven Spielberg, starring Leonardo DiCaprio as Abagnale and Tom Hanks as a FBI agent pursuing him. no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an original essay Although both the fiction and the film are based on Frank's story, they have made changes to their plot. However, fiction and cinema all retain certain similarities. For example, the speaker, Frank Abagnale Jr, was the same between the two, even though the situation he was in was different. The audience was also the same; Frank Abagnale wanted to tell his story to the world. The purpose of the book and the film is also similar. To tell people about Frank Abagnale Jr and his impressive heists and scams. The content shown in the movie was all shown in the book except for a few scenes, and both were centered around the famous saying. And I think these two highlight the destructive nature of parental divorce. In the film, 16-year-old Frank was faced with a life test, this one was not the plight of his father's family on the verge of bankruptcy, nor his struggles from aristocratic school to ordinary high school, but the divorce of his loving parents. At the request of his lawyer, he had to indicate whether he should choose a father or a mother as guardian. It was a choice he didn't know, he wanted to choose a whole family, and his fond memories were fixed on the moment when his father and mother danced gracefully on the stall at home. He chose the third option out of two options and ran away. In addition, certain fictional sentences describe his family situation before his departure. “I left home when I was sixteen looking for myself. There was no pressure on me to leave, even though I wasn't happy. The situation on my dual home front had not changed. Dad always wanted to win Mom back and Mom didn't want to be won over. Dad still used me as a mediator during his second courtship with Mom, and she continued to resent my choice in the role of Cupid. I didn't like it myself. Mom had graduated from dental school and worked for a dentist in Larchmont. She seemed content with her new independent life. I had no intention of running away. But every time Dad put on his postal clerk's uniform and went to work in his old car, I felt depressed. I couldn't forget that he wore Louis Roth suits and drove big expensive cars. » I arrive at a conclusion in two paragraphs. Perhaps, from Frank's point of view, his father's bankruptcy didn't defeat him, but what really defeated him was the broken family. It was the scarf that could take Frank a lifetime to heal from, so this very sad young boy began his own “lonely and crazy” wandering from then on. Since there are similarities, there must be differences. In fact, I found a lot of deference to fiction and cinema. The writers added an original character in , an FBI agent named Carl Hanratty. Carl's creation was based on FBI agent Joseph Shea, the person who ultimately arrested Frank in France. THECarl's character was very calm and full of tenacity, catching Frank was the goal he wanted to achieve. To achieve this goal, he worked hard every day, however, he was always fooled by Frank's tricks and made him disappear from his sight. His appearance made the main character of the film no longer Frank alone. The narrative angle also changed, moving from Frank's point of view to a back and forth between Frank's exploits and Carl, the FBI agent on his trail. Such behavior has a good effect on the dramatic conflict of the film. Dramatic conflict is the constant tension and motivation that produces the content of the story. We can also say that nothing will move forward without conflict. Dramatic conflicts can be described as equivalent to problems in design practices or surprising opportunities that designers find in research. A dramatic conflict can be seen as a struggle or struggle, given the excitement of the narrative, in which the protagonist and his opponent are engaged in a long struggle. (website)As a film's plot develops, more and more differences appear. Frank had a totally different family situation in the film. He was the only child of his parents. His parents truly loved each other and the whole family lived a happy and warm life. Their house was full of laughter and music at that time. Unfortunately, the peace was soon broken. Because Frank's father's stationery company had a tax evasion problem, no bank was willing to lend Frank's old money. Desperately, the Franks moved to a smaller house. These various things caused a deep rift in the mother's close relationship with her father, and eventually she chose to divorce old Frank. When choosing who to live with in the future, Frank could not accept the sudden excitement, and then ran away from home. Frank has three other siblings in fiction. His parents divorced due to conflicting opinions when he was a child. In order to take care of his father's emotions, Frank chose to live with his father. Whatever the version, both Franks had a significant negative impact on the issue of parental divorce. It's just that the film amplifies the negative effects, focusing on the image of a helpless, sad and angry young man. As a chain reaction to the change in family circumstances, Frank's first deception was different. Frank's first act of deception in the film came when he was bullied by other boys after moving to a new school. Because no one knew his real identity, in retaliation, he claimed that the French teacher let the boy who bullied him read the text in public, and even chased away the real French teacher. Surprisingly, his disguise was not discovered until a week later, during which he lectured the students in his class and wanted to arrange a visit. In fact, the fiction appeared that Frank pretended to be a teacher, but the subjects and time were somewhat different. The burnout depicted in the fiction takes place after his father gives Frank a Ford. He conspired with tire salesmen to pretend to buy equipment needed for cars, such as tires, batteries, and gasoline, but secretly let the salesmen sell the equipment and work together to win. Fiction has used a few phrases to describe this scene: "How much would it cost me for a set of white walls?" » I asked. “For this car, $160, but you got a good set of treads,” the man said. He looked at me and I knewthat he felt he was about to propose to me. “Yeah, I don’t really need tires,” I agreed. “But I had a bad case of shorts. I'll tell you what I'll do. I'm going to buy a set of these tires and charge them to this card. Only, I don't take the tires. Give me $100 instead. You still get the tires, and when my dad pays them to Mobil, you get your cut. You're ahead from the start, and when you sell the tires, the entire $160 goes into your pocket. What do you say? You'll kiss like a dragon, man. » If you compare the two scams horizontally, you will find that the scams in the film are like a child's malicious jokes, with a lot of revenge and a joke. Such behavior gave Frank a great feeling of satisfaction, as if he were the source of his happiness. Adding this entertainment to the film is to add a sense of humor to the film, so that the audience is relaxed in serious content. I prefer the film version of "Catch Me If You Can" to fiction. Because I am an unimaginative person, it is difficult for characters depicted in fiction to form a very specific image in my mind. This time I was very upset, but the emergence of the film actually solved my problems. Through the superb performances of the actors, a different personality appeared on the screen, impressive. Like the two protagonists of the film, the world-famous fraudster Frank and the FBI agent Carl. In Frank's spiritual world, a passage is deeply etched in his mind. "Two little mice fell into a bucket of cream. The first mouse quickly gave up and drowned. The second mouse wouldn't stop. He struggled so much that he finally turned the cream into butter and crawled out. Gentlemen, from now on I'm that second mouse When old Frank Abagnale became a life member of the club, he went on stage to thank the speech. did not follow the rules and his business went bankrupt because he was investigated by the government for tax evasion His life was not a success, but his attitude towards life was a bad one. demonstration of his son, Frank Abagnale Jr. This line deeply affected Frank When he was abandoned in adult society, just like a rat falling into cream, he does with the nuns, but he uses fraud to. stir up society and escape his own predicament. First by posing as airline staff to travel more than 3 million kilometers for free, he forged airline checks amounting to nearly $4 million, then became a hospital pediatrician, the More astonishingly, through self-study, in two months to get a lawyer's degree and become an assistant to a prosecutor, he ultimately became the youngest and most audacious liar in American history. If you don't talk about the hero by the means and let Frank in the movie break the law, he is one of the smartest people of his time, and it's fair to say that he turned the second mouse into a magical thing. In the movie, whether Frank was sitting on the beauty or flying around the world, his heart was not really as seen on the surface, full of entertainment for life. In fact, it was a kind of displacement of loneliness and helplessness. Living under the lie, he can really enjoy the money and deception brought him a rich life from the moment very little, most of the time he was worried, playing cat and mouse with the police. Behind the life of entertainment hid pain and discomfort. What Frank can't stand isthat a man has nowhere to tell the truth and the loneliness of wandering, of living nowhere. So every Christmas, Frank calls Carl, the only agent who could talk to him. Carl is the other protagonist of the film, he was not a typical agent, he had neither the majesty nor the style, Carl did not have these classic image of the agent, but his character full of woody and boring. But he had the same careful and delicate spirit. But he had the same careful and delicate spirit. Actually, Carl in the movie gave me a big surprise. Although the film's depiction of Carl's life was no more detailed than Frank's, his character was more three-dimensional than the novel. His middle-aged marriage failed, his daughter was taken care of by his ex-wife, and he was as lonely as little Frank, who devoted himself to his work to alleviate the loneliness. Agent Carl and suspect Frank were therefore friends of the enemy. The moving plot came every Christmas, their fixed greeting. Even if it seemed like sarcasm, provocation, satire, derision. But both of them knew from the bottom of their hearts that in the dimension of loneliness, they and their opponents actually pitied each other and could only relieve loneliness. Not only did he pursue and capture the young fraudster, but through several "confrontations" between them, he felt Frank's heart, read his soul, and finally he understood him. Carl actually understood Frank's emotions and criminal motivations very early on, he knew that Frank was just a lost child, that his relationship with little Frank was beginning to transform and that he was going to bring the lost child home . Depending on the paper, ink, printing technology and other factors of the check, banking experts have deduced that the place of printing the check should be in Europe, most likely in France. As a person who had already understood Frank very well, Carl felt that he was hiding in the French Morid, because this place was his mother's hometown, his parents met here and fell in love with each other. 'other. This was the source of Frank's love, this was his inner longing for his parents, any family reunion. And Frank actually hid in the printing house next to the church in the town of Montreu. At that time, he had grown up and gradually understood that no matter how rich he had been deceived, he could not let his parents let the family return to what it was. So he was actually desperate, completely desperate, he was even a little tired of drifting. This is where Carl caught him, no, Carl found him. In fact, it was also a self-rescue for Agent Carl. I felt like Carl treated Frank more like his own children, he was the one who brought him home to an exotic land from the brink of illness and death; this was a man who went to see him in prison during a lonely Christmas; it was also he who gave a second life to Frank; and he was the only one who understood Frank's childish heart. He had a heartbreak from Frank that he hadn't thought of. He understood that Frank's heart had always longed for the warmth of affection and family reunion. He alone knew Frank best, and Carl ultimately led him on the right path. Eventually Frank came back and he knew there was another man who cared and loved him. No matter how much Frank squandered his youth and escaped punishment, he seemed unable to shake off the progressive pressure placed on him, which is not so much a pursuit as a handicap, a duty. And Carl with Frank's extradition house, almost a clear metaphor, lost teenagers, wandering through the years of the prodigal son, finally return home, finally saved. Although Carl did not keep his house, but create a !.