Euthanasia means ending the life of a seriously ill person to save them from the pain and suffering that illness triggers. Euthanasia is known in other terms as assisted suicide; it swallows the same principles as murder. It is usually only performed on someone with an incurable illness, but there are other occasions when it can be performed. In many countries, such as the UK, it is illegal to help anyone end their life. Should we help terminally ill patients who are enduring a lot of pain to end their lives, should they wish to do so? Besides, who has the freedom to repudiate any patient who suffers a lot of suffering and a less horrible death? These questions generate considerable debate and have been the subject of intense deliberations. Supporters of the euthanasia procedure argue that the patient's wishes must be respected, while those opposed to it argue that the procedure could be abused and lead to distressing situations. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get the original essay Human beings are mortal and their life cycle is fixed. Although we are temporal, human beings try to preserve their life as much as possible; Distress over death and the desire to stay alive are a constant part of human nature. Sometimes, however, the medical field takes advantage of this phase of humanity. While it is true that one of the goals of medicine is to prolong life, its additional goal is to relieve pain and misery. (Engdahl) Christians who generally oppose this act believe that man was created in the likeness and image of God and therefore have a key value. or value, beyond all prices. Almost all pro-life Christian views are based on personal dignity. The act of euthanasia can have a moral logic if it is imaginable to say, honorably, that this self-esteem has disappeared. To commit euthanasia is to act with the specific intention that someone is no one. This is a central error of all wickedness in human associations. To perform a euthanasia procedure on any human being is to fail to notice the individual's fundamental value or self-esteem. The decision that anything of value, fundamentally, has no value, is both morally and logically wrong. The morality of the act of euthanasia centers on dualistic anthropology as well as the false moral assumptions fundamental to the justification of euthanasia, called consequentialism (Engdahl). The basic claim of proponents of this act's beliefs is that human beings are deliberately felt subjects whose self-esteem involves their ability to make decisions and define their destiny. Natural bodily life is a form of personal life, for without bodily life the individual cannot be a determinate matter of experience. This means that the bodily life of a human being is different from his personal life. Therefore, the human body and its bodily lifespan are contributory goods, possessions for that particular person, and not properties of the individual. It follows that there may be such a belief that it is not worth staying alive, an individual is not able to make decisions that bodily life is burdensome or unnecessary, and in situations where it becomes useless, the individual, that is to say consciously feeling the matter, has the freedom to free himself from this inoperable burden. Currently, a major issue in the fight against assisted suicide and euthanasia is.