The existence of God has been controversial for centuries. Many people have reflected on the discussion. From the rationalist's perspective, the argument is understood to be motivated by two distinct disciplines that combine epistemology and ontology. Knowledge of assumptions is associated with epistemology, and ontology reflects on the state of nature from which individuals work. Until disproved, David Hume was a philosopher who never accepted the existence of God. He uses many reasons to examine the five statements used by Thomas Aquinas to demonstrate that there is an individual called God. There is also another philosopher named Immanuel Kant who also does not understand the existence of God and discredits the ontological claim put forward by Thomas Aquinas. Seeing Thomas Aquinas' point of view, it is obvious that God exists. His five theories concerning the existence of God are the teleological theory, the characteristics of the objects of the planet, the ability to move the unmoved, that which says that nothing is the product of itself and the cosmological statement. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get the original essay From the philosopher's perspective, it is clear that his arguments are based on the epistemology and ontology of two disciplines. Theoretical understanding is linked to epistemology and ontology focuses on human nature. David Hume was a psychologist who never claimed that God existed unless proven otherwise. He provides further arguments to refute Aquinas's five claims to explain why a human is called a god in the universe. Interestingly, there is another atheist called Joseph Kant who does not accept the existence of God and refutes the ontological arguments of Thomas Aquinas. When you look at Aquinas' view, it is clear that there is God. The teleological, the attributes of things in the universe, the ability to move the immovable are his five points regarding the existence of God, which suggests that nothing emerges from itself and the cosmological statement. The idea of ​​wrongdoing is the main claim that God does not exist. There are three reasons why it is claimed that the existence of God cannot be real, the first therefore asserts that: sin is genuine and God has the ability to prevent it. The second argument for the non-existence of God is that God is not only love because he gave suffering to people's nature. The third argument is that He is not benevolent because He cannot eradicate evil, but He has the ability to do so. Such a rejection of the existence of God is misleading because it indicates that evil comes as a discomfort to us when looking at Aquinas' assertion. This means that evil is produced because a certain community lacks a valuable good, which is therefore permitted by nature to belong to its existing creatures. He continues to assert that "bad" is something reasonable and not genuine and therefore should not be compared to what God can do as such, and that it does not come from a source positive. Interactions with objects and with each other or with individuals will create harm, which contributes to creating a feeling of discomfort between them. Not realizing the universe will make life unshakable. Judgments against someone cannot be passed if no mistake is made. David Hume, who is contrary to Aquinas's assertions, offers the second argument. He challenges his cosmological claim supporting the existence of God, as he asserts that the nature of any entity found on earth should beclarified. He asserts that the endless sequence of notions must have an exact reason behind it. He says that since we cannot explain why humans exist on earth, the solution implies that the chance endless chain is the result of each person's own origin. Since people don't understand where the events and objects that are supposed to be in their world are, he claims they can't be heard about. The notion proposed by Hume is incompatible with the evaluation of the existence of God, because it accepts the presence of God from the point of view of its probability, according to what Thomas Aquinas suggests. According to Aquinas, the presence of God determines why uncaused events became part of the universe. It also suggests that the Beginningless World is clarified in the notion of probability or entity dependence within the Universe. Using this logic, Aquinas argues that in some years nothing actually happened. Nothing could come to anything if nothing happened, because nothing can be made of anything. This is why he asserted that there was, and exists, a real being who produced all beings in the world, and who must therefore fulfill his duty in order to support and show the existence of God. Leibniz Gottfried, a philosopher named, invented the principle of “adequate reason”. There is much support for Aquinas's claim that Gottfried existed. This principle states that a real premise cannot exist if the allegations have not been presented for sufficient reasons. However, for these necessary factors, human beings must understand the causes of most of what currently exists and their importance in culture. It is then from this point of view that people understand the idea of ​​God's existence as reality and therefore many will accept it. Finally, Immanuel Kant disagreed with the ontological interpretation in which Aquinas concluded that a thought in the imagination of a human being is smaller than that in the soul and in the form of a fact. He believes that a human's expectations do not have the same function as reality. He claims it's like having a useless item and applying it to the same list. He defends his idea by saying that people may want to think that God is recognized as universal, so they can only predict but cannot support the claim that he actually exists. He continues to say that its nature is theoretically random, because conceptual events cannot be expected and therefore followed to give definitions of existence. His argument suggests that you cannot believe something exists, but it is not visible, so what you will see is what it has done and what it will do in a few years. Immanuel Kant claimed that the argument from ontology failed to prove itself self-evident because something that does not exist is loaded with love than what exists today. This indicates that it supports the concept, according to Aquinas, that in this definition of ontology the Lord resides. . He says you don't have to listen to God to understand how big He is or how big His body is to be faithful to Him. We can only understand that people have different qualities that might be similar to him. Aquinas advises one to be willing to ignore the advice of one's adversaries to recognize the presence of God and accept that, whatever may be, man is greater and remains. Keep in mind: this is just a sample. Get a custom paper now from our expert writers.Get a custom essayIn conclusion, it is plausible that the existence of God is true according to the arguments put forward by Thomas Aquinas. THE.