Rape, as defined by the American Heritage Dictionary, is “the crime of forcing a woman to have sexual intercourse,” while legally and psychologically, rape is considered force or the threat of force, as well as something being seized. or taken away. It is rare that rape is actually linked to sexual pleasure, which is one of the many arguments put forward in the Brzonkala v. Virginia Polytechnic Inst. And State University. This case began with a young woman being raped by two college football players during her freshman year at Virginia Tech. in 1994. Say no to plagiarism. Get a custom essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get the original essay One night, a woman named Christy Brzonkala and a peer of hers were hanging out with two people Brzonkala only really knew as college football players. Brzonkala claimed that that night the two men raped her several times. When Brzonkala reported her rape to her school two months after the incident, the school did not report the rape to the police, nor did the police encourage Brzonkala to further report the crime (Brzonkala v. Virginia Polytechnic 1997). Virginia Tech ultimately held a hearing in which one of Brzonkala's rapists openly admitted to forcing sex, even though Brzonkala said "no" twice. The other rapist formally denied everything but confirmed that his friend had forced Brzonkala to have sex. This student was dismissed without further action. The student who admitted to forced sex was expected to be suspended for a year, which he later appealed. After appealing this decision by Virginia Tech and threatening to sue the university twice, he ultimately won and was able to return to Virginia Tech the following fall of 1995, and he would come on a full scholarship ( Brzonkala v. Virginia Polytechnic 1997). Later, Brzonkala began to believe and claim that the head football coach at the time had coordinated part of the second hearing due to the rapist's status. This is what gave the rapist the opportunity to play football the following fall. After alleging this, Brzonkala decided not to return to Virginia Tech and to also file a lawsuit against the university. Brzonkala argued that she was treated unfairly during many parts of the trial, saying she was told she could not testify at the second hearing after the first and that if she wanted to, she had to do so. call. Because she was not given enough time to appeal, she was completely unprepared for the hearing, while her alleged rapist was given generous time to prepare for his second hearing. Brzonkala also stated that she was informed of all measures taken during all hearings of the disciplinary proceedings, but that regarding her rapist's return to school, she received no warning; she had to learn on her own from a newspaper. Keep in mind: this is just a sample. Get a personalized article from our expert writers now. Get a Custom Essay In December 1995, Brzonkala officially filed suit against the two original rapists and Virginia Tech. . Brzonkala claimed that Virginia Tech violated Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, due to the way they handled his rape complaints and their failure to punish rapists reasonably (Brzonkala v. Virginia Polytechnic 1997)...