Fyodor Dostoyevsky once said: “Nothing is more attractive to man than his freedom of conscience, but nothing is a greater cause of suffering. » Thus, being nothing or accomplishing nothing in life insinuates that failure is inevitable. A particular example of this is found in Dostoyevsky's novel Crime and Punishment; in Fyodor Dostoyevsky's novel Crime and Punishment, there are some differences from Michael Darlow's 1979 film adaptation, but the similarities are surprisingly obvious. During the exploration of the similarities and differences between the novel and the 1979 film adaptation of Crime and Punishment, three overlapping themes will be observed. The first theme that will be examined is the setting and the ways in which the book and film are similar and different. Secondly, the theories behind the protagonist's mindset will be explored and how they manifest and develop throughout the book and film. Finally, we will see the actions of the protagonist in the way they affect the human mind. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an Original Essay The setting of any work provides a basis for any story, including the characters that populate it; In Crime and Punishment, Fyodor Dostoyevsky paints a picture of the expansion of Saint Petersburg and how it fits into the daily lives of all the characters. The similarities between the setting of Fyodor Dostoyevsky's novel Crime and Punishment and Michael Darlow's 1979 film adaptation can be widely seen to the point that there is virtually no difference. Connections that appear in both the novel Crime and Punishment and the film adaptation include the period (the 1860s) in which the expansion of St. Petersburg occurs, the way the characters live and participate in their daily lives and the contrast between the rich and the poor. with light and darkness. In the novel, Fyodor Dostoyevsky paints a picture of the city with the quote "The heat in the street was terrible: and the lack of air, the bustle and the plaster, the scaffolding, the bricks and the dust all around him , and that special stench of Petersburg, so familiar to everyone who cannot leave the city in summer, all worked painfully on the already strained nerves of the young man. Due to the proximity of the HayMarket, the number of establishments of bad morals, crowded in these streets and alleys. in the heart of Petersburg. » Michael Darlow's 1979 film shows a dirty, polluted city being built and modernized with drunken fights, children begging and prostitutes all over the streets. The differences in setting can be slightly visible in the book and the movie, because the book and movie are very detailed in the same way, this difference can be seen between the contrast between the rich and the poor. In the novel Fyodor Dostoyevsky shows the poor with lack of good clothes, starvation and irritability and the rich with many well-finished clothes, intellectual scholars and with plenty of food. At the beginning of the novel, the protagonist Raskolnikov is described as so poorly dressed that even a man accustomed to poverty would not want his clothes and that he is so poor that he has been starving and shrinking for three weeks. While in the film Michael Darlow shows the poor people without light, obscured by darkness, living in small and poor places and having nothing, the rich had windows filled with beautiful lights entering huge and large rooms, filledwealth and everything they wanted. Although there are some differences in setting, the similarities go beyond the extent to which the novel and film match, the only main difference from the book and film is that the film plays with light and shadow to demonstrate the differences between those people and places who are rich and wealthy. those who are poor. The central characters of the story fall into two philosophical categories. The first group states that people are trapped in the laws and traditions of society, existing only to continue to follow and teach these traditions, values ​​and morals to future generations; While the second group is extraordinary, they have the moral right to break the law if their transgression is for the good of humanity in which all actions can be taken. Throughout the novel and film, Fyodor Dostoyevsky and Michael Darlow combat the theory of the extraordinary human complex with the protagonist Raskolnikov and his faithful friend Razumikhin. At the beginning of the story, Raskolnikov wonders whether or not he should kill the pawnbroker and decides to do it for the good of society, since she was taking the only possessions of the poor and taxing them on the money that she lent. Later, throughout the story of the novel and film, Raskolnikov had written an article two months earlier which stated that "extraordinary individuals can overcome certain... obstacles, but only if they do so for reason , for example, for the salvation of humanity. Razumikhin was horrified to see what Raskolnikov believed in, Razumikhin said: “What? What the hell? A right to crime?' horrified by the thought of his friend and fought, no one has the right to take another person's life. Raskolnikov then explains in more detail his ideas in which he compares himself to Napoleon and how great he was; Raskolnikov said: “I asked myself this question one day: what if Napoleon, for example, had been in my place, and if he had not had Toulon, nor Egypt, nor the passage of Mont- White to start his career, but instead of all these picturesque and monumental things, there had simply been a ridiculous old witch, a pawnbroker, who also had to be murdered to get money from her trunk…. He would have strangled her in a minute without thinking about it!' Not only do the novel and film address these two theories, but also the psychological makeup of humans and how the protagonist's actions affect them mentally. Finally, a person can tell a lot about someone in the way that person thinks and reacts to complex situations. . Fyodor Dostoyevsky and Michael Darlow delve into the human mind by examining the psychological, emotional and mental state of protagonist Raskolnikov and how his double-axe murder affects him. Fyodor Dostoyevsky and Michael Darlow venture through Raskolnikov's psyche in ways similar in essence but different in some ways, Raskolnikov's character undergoes a great change throughout the story. Fyodor Dostoyevsky allows the reader to see into Raskolnikov's mind in three ways, first through his dreams and his subconscious, then by using symbols of redemption and sin, and finally through the narrator telling the reader what happens in Raskolnikov's mind or what he thinks. Michael Darlow, on the other hand, gives the viewer Raskolnikov's mind in the form of his dreams, symbols of sin and religion, Raskolnikov telling people how he feels by blurting it out, and Raskolnikov having intellectual arguments with the police and his friend saying how he would commit the crimes. After Raskolnikov committed the double murder, he sat stunned on his couch for..