In Margaret Thatcher's argument lie many different flaws, which both limit the study of sociology , as well as the concept of simple logic. Sociology, the study of human society and social interactions, represents everything Thatcher disagreed with. To Thatcher, it seemed that the English population was nothing more than a socially alienated group where everyone only sought their own interests and had no connection with others. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get the original essay This clearly embodies Thatcher's lack of sociological imagination, as she either is unwilling or unable to recognize the presence of corporations. If she can't, that's somewhat understandable. She is conservative. Thus, in the absence of a recognized and studyable society, for Margaret Thatcher there was neither interest nor reason to bother with sociology as a scientific study. Even within the definition of corporation, which states that a corporation "is likely to be subject to the same political authority", Margaret Thatcher still refused to recognize even her own party as a corporation, making the English government the scourge of sociological studies for eleven years, seven months and twenty-four days. However, anyone, even those closest to Thatcher or those ruled by Thatcher, can see clear relationships between her and the people she associates with. Assuming that Margaret Thatcher was not simply given the right to act as Prime Minister, it is also impossible to pretend that society does not exist. Comparing the English political scene to that of Chimpanzee Politics, and without pretending that Thatcher solves problems with excrement, we see that the chimpanzee power struggle is very similar to political scenes, where there is a constant struggle for power , and usually the dominant male. is challenged by a single new candidate. In many ways, their political process is also very similar to the modern campaign process in that they must seek the approval of others to assume the position of power, just as Luit must seek the approval of others. the approval of others before Yeroen's overthrow. Just as the fight against chimpanzees ends "before the conflict", modern politics acts in much the same way, with a certain candidate leading for each loyalty, despite any other advice or confrontation. Ironically, Margaret Thatcher as former Prime Minister of England (which is itself a status, another sociological term), essentially has the executive power to preside over the people. However, in her statement where she ignores the concept of society, she also shows one of her biggest flaws. As Prime Minister, no one would logically claim that she governs Jim, Bob, Robert, Eric and Martin as individuals, but as a society as a whole. Furthermore, given that she comes from the English Conservative Party, it is seriously unlikely that she would claim to represent the conservative interests of Jim, Bob, Robert, Eric and Martin as individuals, but as conservative party as a whole. It is physically and mentally impossible to meet everyone's personal needs. So even though Thatcher relies on suggestions of a society, she claims that no such society exists. Regarding a specific word in his quote, stating that "families" exist but society does not goes against basic Oxford English. Without even talking about sociology, the definition “all of..