To begin the course, we first discussed both the nature of science and the nature of technology. What I took away from the discussion was that science has to do with the natural world and has a more comprehensive approach rather than technology, which deals with the man-made world and takes a more applicational approach. The class did an activity that dealt with our eyes, minds, and perception. A few pictures were shown containing two different images and everyone was asked what they were saying in the pictures. For me, the hardest part was with the lady with the white blanket on her head because it took me a few minutes to really see the other hidden image. After the activity, we discussed what observation versus perception is, learning that things can mean much more than you thought they saw, that people have different perceptions and may think something different. different from you or another person. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why violent video games should not be banned”? Get an original essay While doing my own homework, I began to understand this point by scrolling through social media and seeing a picture with a color-blind person, only to realize that these people were born without the ability to recognize colors as other people would. Continuing in the lecture, we then studied the three different types of scientific methods that may have been used by scientists in their time, namely: the inductive approach, the deductive approach and the hypothetico-deductive approach. I learned that induction is a valid type of reasoning and therefore begins with observations. Once a specific pattern is observed, a hypothesis can be derived and then a theory can be developed. One example I remembered in class was the one with the swans, stating that all swans are right, which was derived based on an inductive method, and then along comes a black swan who falsified the entire theory that all swans are white. This example led to a major drawback of induction because theories based on this type can turn out to be false at any time. Then we moved on to deductive reasoning, which is based on a premise, a premise is a statement that supports the conclusion. Deductive reasoning is the opposite of inductive reasoning, simply because you must first design a testable hypothesis, then observe the results through experimentation. We then moved on to the much more reliable and beneficial approach, which is the hypothetico-deductive method. This method is considered the only “true” method of scientific research. It includes the deductive approach, then testing that theory, trying to falsify it, then studying the results for consistency, then accepting or rejecting the hypothesis based on the hypothesis. results.Keep in mind: This is just a sample.Get a custom paper from our expert writers now.Get a custom essayThis lecture has been beneficial to me in this course because it broadens my learning, it was a lot more work than I thought it would be, but that didn't deter me from going home and doing my work before what I didn't understand at the start of the course. I would now keep in mind that perspectives may change depending on the understanding of the situation and I will continue to work and learn in this course..