Author Ponice Rustch reintroduces herself and her position on sugary beverages with these statements: “We've said it before, and we'll say it again: we consume much more sugar than is good for our health. For this reason, the next generation of Americans will struggle with obesity and diabetes more than any other. The most obvious culprit is added sugar in sodas and other sugary drinks, like sports drinks or teas. » Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get the original essay Rustch firmly believes that Americans consume more sugar in our drinks than is good for our health. One idea proposed by public health advocates to reduce sugar consumption was to tax drinks with a certain amount of added sugar. Another of their actions was to reduce the size of soda cups. The latest idea from lawmakers in New York and California is a warning label. They create labels for high-sugar drinks such as soda and energy drinks, similar to labels you would see on cigarette packs or alcohol bottles. Its contributors believe that drinks with added sugar and 75 or more calories in a 12-ounce serving should carry this label. In discussing the labeling bill with Salt, California Senate President Bill Monning said, "It's also good for the consumer to know if we're talking about these health issues." He also adds: “This could mitigate the frequency with which [consumers] would purchase these products. » What Bill Monning is saying here about the label is that it is trying to make consumers aware of what they are consuming and putting into their bodies. The article also contains an image of what the label would look like, including the following information about the beverage's contents: "State of California Safety Warning: Drinking beverages with added sugar(s) contributes to obesity, diabetes and tooth decay. » This label is Monning's second attempt at the California state legislature, after being blocked last year. Around the same time as Bill Monning, New York State Assemblyman Jeffrey Dinowitz was trying to push a similar bill through the State Assembly. “Dinowitz is more optimistic about the label bill because it seems more feasible.” (Rustch, par. 10) Dinowitz notes, "We're not banning anything, we're not telling anyone you can't have cups, it's just a warning." » (Rustch, para. 11) Harold Goldstein, executive director of the California Center for Public Health Advocacy, an organization focused on combating obesity, sponsored the bill. Goldstein says, "The body absorbs liquid sugar from soda and other drinks much faster than sugar from other foods, reaching blood sugar levels in as little as 30 minutes." It's much easier to drink teaspoons of sugar in soda than to eat them. And sugar doesn't fill you up like fat or protein will. I increasingly view these products as diabetes in a bottle. With these labels, sugary drinks draw close comparisons to products such as cigarettes. Goldstein's goal is to share the result of the anti-smoking campaign, the number of smokers in the United States has been steadily decreasing since the label first appeared in 1965. the anti-smoking campaign, the anti-soda campaign has his own opposition in.”