“Those Who Walk Away from Omelas” is a fictional story classified as a short story by author Ursula Le Guin . The story has a vivid description that is repeated a lot in the narration of the lifestyle of the people of Omelas. The story is full of deliberately vague and vivid descriptions. The narrator explains the happiness in the town of Omela, but it becomes clear that the narrator does not know the details. The fictional nature of the story becomes clear when the narrator leaves the reader free to imagine the details as they wish, “it doesn't matter. As we like it” (Le, 1973). Say no to plagiarism. a custom essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”?Get original essayUrsula K. Le Guin wrote a very dark dystopian world in the story “Those Who Walk Away from Omelas”. She presents Omelas as a utopia where everyone who lives there is happy because they live off the suffering of a single child. For everyone who lives in Omelas to continue living their happy lives, everything depends on the misery of one child. “keep quiet for a day or two, then leave the house…[walking] straight out of the town of Omelas[.]” It completely astounds them, as it does me, to see a child being treated so badly when they see the child for the first time, but then try to convince themselves that even if they saved the child, there is no way he would be able to enjoy life because of everything he has already suffered, the child will not would never be able to adapt since he has suffered for so long, so what would be the point of these people moving away from this "utopia" is that they are actually more humane and more compassionate? the people who live in Omelas They cannot live with the guilt of knowing what all their happiness is due to, but at the same time they cannot spoil the happiness of others with their own selfishness of wanting to save the child, so. they move away into the unknown. The story gives the details of the Summer Festival celebrated by the Omelas. The matching of the people and the songs shows the happiness that dominates among them. However, the narrator moves away from the celebration and recounts the misery of a child locked in an isolated house in the Omelas. From the story of the suffering child comes the idea of ​​the scapegoat. According to Nugroho (2016), scapegoating is the act of placing blame on someone rather than others. The narrator makes the reader understand that the suffering of the children is in exchange for the happiness of the inhabitants of Omelas. If the child is to leave home and be given the opportunity to enjoy life like the Omelas, then suffering is bound to befall the people of Omelas. Thus, the child is described as the one who saves life since his misery makes life possible. Ritchie (2016) posited that allegories are stories that describe events and represent the events metaphorically. In this context, the suffering child is used to represent the rich and the poor. The poor seem to work for the rich and the happy few. However, all conclusions about the meaning and causes of the child's suffering are left by the narrator at the disposal of the reader. Based on the context and insight of the story, one can conclude that the story is Apollonian. Leddy (2016) describes the Apollonians as works in which aspects of human nature are presented as rational, orderly, and full of discipline. Happiness fills the people of Omelas and the writer describes the child as someone whose freedom has been limited. People, especially.20070609)